that is only news left in article, take care of this from time onwards, thanks.
These Indian buggers should learn from Shoaib, Dhoni got but he was not deserving for, so he will do all this Chhishorapan, Ganguly and Sachin at least not expected to do this, watching movie is not bad, but after loosing match he is saying these things, than definitely not playing for country, he is playing for money and publicity. SHAME ON HIM.
RE:Who went to loo
by Rohan Joshi on Nov 10, 2007 08:56 AM
I feel you should shame on yourself who takes out such thing from every normal things. Don't do so, let the cricketers also enjoy being human beings. A loss or a win should not immediately question about the the love of our cricketers for the country.
RE:Who went to loo
by JM on Nov 10, 2007 06:10 AM
This is exactly what the idiot-reporter wants us to think. If you want to compare 2 people or 2 teams, you need to consider a broad spectrum before concluding. If you consider 1 day then Zaheer could be a better batsman that Tendulkar and Dhoni can be a better bowler than Harbajan.
I hope the readers are more mature than this reporter.
I dont know what the idiot reporter is implying here...
Fora normal person who understands English the way it is used normally in most parts of the world, saying "Indian team watched a movie WHILE Akhtar visited an orphanage" (key word WHILE) obviously means that somehow Indian cricketers dont care while Akhtar is a humanitarian.
I dont know for how long Rediff will carry these idiot-"reporters". I have seen _many_ people who write comments here to be much more mature and competant than these idiot-reporters.
RE:Rediff mixing contexts...
by Ramesh Bhandari on Nov 10, 2007 04:40 AM
"WHILE" means "meantime" here - It is a perfectly valid statement! Lets say, "However" or "But" was used that you might say what you are trying to imply! Cheers!
RE:Rediff mixing contexts...
by JM on Nov 10, 2007 06:06 AM
You are right Ramesh, if "however" or "but" was used it would leave no doubts.
Maybe the intention of the reporter was to convey 2 sentences, with no comparison with each other but if you join 2 seemingly contrasting pieces of information with a "while" (or even "meantime"), there is an implied comparison and a conclusion.
So either the reporter wants to make a snide remark OR he wants to make a snide remark while acting innocent OR he is just plain stupid and doesnt know the proper usage of English.
RE:WARNING
by precision on Nov 10, 2007 03:08 AM
Hey rajiv Ranjan....1st learn good english and then try to write something...ur english sucks..and for god sake stop writing on muslims or on hindus...this topics are so boring..it seems that ur a frustrated fool,with no sense and moral...bloody cheap and loose character,stop saying anything about any religion.Useless person,sahme on you,dont call urself Indian,you give bad name to a country like India.
RE:RE:WARNING
by google lover on Nov 10, 2007 03:17 AM
fully agree with u. i dont see a point in raising hindu-muslim or northie-southie issues in every damn article whether it be relevant or not. these fools should seriously get a life
RE:RE:some hindus have a inferioty complex
by on Nov 10, 2007 03:38 AM
Before pointing at Hindu, look at yourself. Who know who SRK is, He is the new SUper Star and we Indian have made him the Super Star. And majority of Indians are Hindus. You soundz Muslim Fundamentalist and unable to use common sense.. shame on you!!
