RE:Radcliffe and Sachin
by on Jul 30, 2007 02:36 AM
bt meanwhile bengal tiger... u r still starving... do sumthin... may b u cn ask sachin for sum money... he wudnt let u down... hes very kind...
Being an indian we are feel proud to have player like Sachin tendulkar, he is the only one, no one can become sachin as a player or as a human. he is the honour of india... He is the king of millions heart not only in india, he is the most respected cricketer in the world
sachin is a real hero,so the harry potter is his fan. and that actor who is playing this role his is just an actor and follows theit directors order. but here there is no director at playing time,no any script, no any prepaered locations. so our sachin is a real hero and i wish to break the lara's test record.
RE:Radcliffe lends scratch pad to Sachin
by Archana Krishnan on Jul 25, 2007 03:53 PM
Sachin irrespective of what anybody says is no GOD but is indeed the highest form of human. HE has scaled the heights of glories at very young age and has till now has not let that affect him as a person. He has no airs around him. And anybody would like to ape him. I feel that before we point a finger at him if we look at ourself( we have 4 fingers pointing at us) and we have not achieved even .01% of what he has! So i would kindly request all who want to mock Sachin.
RE:Radcliffe lends scratch pad to Sachin
by Tejas Gurjar on Jul 25, 2007 05:22 PM
Well said Archana. But I think it may have been too much for 'Bengal Tiger' to comprehend. Please forgive him for not having understood or appreciated your message.
RE:Radcliffe lends scratch pad to Sachin
by Bengal Tiger on Jul 25, 2007 05:57 PM
You have not achieved even 0.1 % of Sachin, that means you are only 1% selfish unlike 100% selfish Sachin.
Sachin is the most selfish human being who will not retire but keep blocking the chances of Yuvraj and other young cricketers.
RE:Radcliffe lends scratch pad to Sachin
by Tejas Gurjar on Jul 25, 2007 06:37 PM
What has Yuvraj achieved in tests that you are feeling so for him? As far as retirement is concerned, there are others ahead of Sachin in the queue. Particularly some southpaws from your neck of the woods.
RE:Radcliffe lends scratch pad to Sachin
by Bengal Tiger on Jul 25, 2007 07:04 PM
Yuvraj can't achieve because, Sachin is like a 1000 pound gorilla who won't retire and pave the way for Yuvraj.
Dada is BTW outperforming Sachin since his comeback, its Sachin who is now the most useless batsman alongwith the spineless Dravid.
RE:Radcliffe lends scratch pad to Sachin
by Tejas Gurjar on Jul 25, 2007 07:38 PM
So DADA's 40 in the first innings was the most useful, unselfish knock wasn't it? What abt the second innnings? Why didn't he take us to victory? Did he choke? How about sharing the blame equally mate.
RE:Radcliffe lends scratch pad to Sachin
by CricketLover on Jul 25, 2007 07:44 PM
Bengal Tiger, you are nuts not to understand. Yuvraj has been given quite a few chances in tests and has very few good performances. The fact is 1.) He cannot play spinners 2.) Cant play moving ball. Both of these due to no footwork and poor technique. If at all, Laxman should be dropped as he is totally inconsistent. As regards Saurav, he is not converting the 30s into big scores, same as Sachin. It is disgusting to see the comments about one of the greatest players of all times. SAchin may not be the same as earlier, so let the selectors drop him but you have no right to call him names.
Sachin is good but is no God it is. I is was a medum fan (no big fan)of Sachin when I is school goes. When I is colage goes I is big fan of cluesener. I is also big fan of stiv wauh. But I is no big fan of Sachin. He is older it is now and is that I is no more even a medum fan it is now. Thank you.
THIS IS SOUR BUT TRUTH-OUT OF 37 TEST CENTURIES SCORED BY SACHIN, ONLY 2 CENTURIES CAME IN THE FOURTH INNING OF THE MATCH WHERE YOUR SCORE IS MOST IMPORTANT TO WIN MATCHES. THE LAST TEST VS ENGLAND IS AN EXAMPLE.HE IS A GOOD BATSMAN BUT NOT A MATCH WINNER OR A MAN OF CRISIS. I LIKE SACHIN TOO MUCH BUT I THINK HE SHOULD GRACEFULLY QUIT CRICKET WITH RESPECT AND GOOD MEMORIES.
RE:SACHIN GOOD NOT GREAT
by Tejas Gurjar on Jul 25, 2007 01:11 PM
First innings scores are equally important in setting-up a big score and setting up the match. It is a pity that people do not understand or appreciate the number of matches Sachin has setup for India to win. I agree that his 4th innings performances have been poor. That criticism is justified but people should not forget the number of times he has helped setup a victory. His centuries v/s Aus at Chennai ('98, '01) are a case in point. People will always criticise him for his failures to 'finish off' matches but they should do better to remember the number of matches he has set-up which is equally important.
Some points I would like to note here: 1) India never had a quality attack like Aus to bowl out sides twice especially abroad. So all our hopes would be pinned on batting to save us the matches and esp. on Sachin (at least till the mid 90s) 2) Many of Sachin's centuries have come in drawn matches. Again point #1 has something to do with that as well. We just didn't have the bowling to finish off the opposition.
RE:SACHIN GOOD NOT GREAT
by Bengal Tiger on Jul 25, 2007 06:01 PM
Rubbish, with bowling attack of RP Singh, Zaheer we bowled out England for less than 300 runs in both innings. Don't talk your crap about bowling its the batting especially of useless Sachin which lets the team down always.
RE:SACHIN GOOD NOT GREAT
by Tejas Gurjar on Jul 25, 2007 06:27 PM
I suggest you read my previous reply carefully (assuming you are able to read and it is not too much for your feeble mind to understand)
I had said that the criticism against Sachin in 2nd innings is perfectly valid. But people should also recognize his efforts in setting up matches in first innings (and second innings when batting first). Also I would like to quote the following example: Remember, SCG test in 2003. India scored something like 700 runs in the first innings. Sachin scoring a double hundred. The match was nicely setup for our bowlers. But they failed to bowl out the opposition twice. Classic example to prove my point. I can give you more.
RE:SACHIN GOOD NOT GREAT
by Bengal Tiger on Jul 25, 2007 07:06 PM
Again super rubbish what was Sachin's strike rate at SCG, he wasted 600 balls for his double hundred, in the end resulting in little time for the bowlers to get the required wickets.
Check out the comments of the all great cricketers who rate it as Sachin's worst knock. He struggled and was only playing shots in on side.
RE:SACHIN GOOD NOT GREAT
by CricketLover on Jul 25, 2007 07:50 PM
Mr Bengal Tiger, The 241 in Aus was made when SAchin just came out of the left leg injury. During that time he was not able to play on the off side as comfortably as he normally would. So he had to cut down on the off side strokes and played mostly on the on side.Despite this he was able to score a double hundred which you may not be able to comprehend. Ask Steve Waugh and other Australian players about this innings. So just stop posting some rubbish here.
RE:RE:SACHIN GOOD NOT GREAT
by Tejas Gurjar on Jul 25, 2007 07:59 PM
Imagine how great Sachin is when a knock of 250 is his worst. The critics have a point about the knock being unaesthetic, but cricket is not a beauty contest.
Sachin may have struggled but the knock was important nonetheless. The bowlers had 3 full days to bowl them out twice but still failed. Wonder how the captain was handling the bowling changes/fielding? Any guesses who the captain was in that series?
RE:SACHIN GOOD NOT GREAT
by Ifear paceman on Jul 25, 2007 10:02 AM
Kapil averages 18.40 in fourth innings in test matches.
The only fifty in fourth innings comes against Sri Lanka in 1985, 2nd Test at P.Saravanamuttu Stadium, Colombo Result: Sri Lanka won by 149 runs Sri Lanka leads the 3-Test series 1-0
Kapil made 6 in first innings and 78 in second innings.
RE:SACHIN GOOD NOT GREAT
by Bengal Tiger on Jul 25, 2007 11:05 AM
Kapil scored 175 in a world cup tournament, which India went on to win. Kapils Devils and kapil himself have achieved million times more than selfish Sachin. BTW Kapil was mainly a bowler.
RE:SACHIN GOOD NOT GREAT
by Sameer Bhagwat on Jul 25, 2007 10:16 AM
I is no liked or dislikinged sachin but I is no saport abuse at him. He is a humen na? He is old na? Plis no abuse he it is.Thank you gentlemans.
RE:Beware.....................
by Sameer Bhagwat on Jul 25, 2007 10:15 AM
Syed sir you is right but he is no goodest magician. If you is fan of magician then you is watch chandrakanta. Their is lot and lot of danger magician it is.
i think harry is much much better then little master i don't know why people like harry wants to take an autograph of that person who is not willing to do anything for his country. harry u r the best so don't ever stand in que. u r great
RE:Harry
by Afred Abraham on Jul 25, 2007 10:30 AM
A single news about Sachin, on match or off it. people just need nothing to criticize the legend what is Sachin.
Criticizing is one way to show ur likeness for something, because u crave for that thing to do good to you.. anyways. Sachin's performance rules the mood of the nation so when he fails that dislike comes like this. When we don't care about something we just criticize once and then leave off... not bothered.
So Mr. Popli, nothing wrong with you.. u r very normal to human nature. Still why not put ur skills to write beautiful and on track.
RE:Harry
by roopak maheshwari on Jul 25, 2007 09:43 AM
man this is very bad.The most easy task in this world to critisize somebody.Sachin has done so much for india that we can even list it out.he is gReat and makes our county Great.Every other country talks abour sachin from India is a great personality and u from india dosent always keep on critisizing.
RE:RE:Harry
by JAYAPRAKASH SAHOO on Jul 25, 2007 09:38 AM
To Nitin Popli, I think u have not seen sachin's cricket, what Harry has done for his contry, he has earned for himeself only. how are u comapring harry with sachin, u must be a magician :-)
RE:Harry
by Osho on Jul 25, 2007 10:25 AM
If you think Harry is great then you should also understand that Great people always think before acting and If he (Harry) is standing in Queue then he must be knowing that what he is up to. From this you can imagine the Heights of OUR countryman (cricketer). He made your Great (Best) man to stand in queue......
RE:Harry
by Tejas Gurjar on Jul 25, 2007 01:14 PM
You moron, its Daniel Radcliffe who took Sachin's autograph, not 'Harry'. You must be on drugs comparing a fictional character with a real life person.
RE:Harry
by girish sonavane on Jul 25, 2007 09:45 AM
freind, there is much difference between movies and cricket, in movie actors r given chances to rectify their mistake while in cricket chances of mistake r rare, after all its live they have to perform on the ground itself no any cut announced by producer
RE:Harry
by Bidhubhusan mahapatra on Jul 25, 2007 09:25 AM
yes, what have you done for country at least for you Galli/ mohalla. First think about that, then only put question mark on Sachin's credibility. he is a genius. and at the same time he is a human being. So he may fail for sometime..but not always..If you think harry is the best, then you should ask him also, whether is really a great person or not.
and he bats at number 4 for india...ok ok stop the abuses...sachins not God but he is the greatest batsman the world has seen after sir don...we should all be proud of him instead of constantly trying to pull him down
RE:i have seen GOD
by Golden on Jul 25, 2007 09:08 AM
what happend? from God now you have come down and pulling this guy's ego to lower level. sachin will pay for being God and not apologising in public against it... it seems this potter himself knows little about the cricket. he perhaps is too busy and doesnt know that this guy has been booooooooed in his own home land/ mother land/ janam bhoomi by his own people....
RE:i have seen GOD
by Palakkadan on Jul 25, 2007 09:29 AM
Let Sachin say now, that he would not draw any remuneration now onwards.... and the same money would go to charity!!!! that is the only way he can show a little bit of love towards Indians.
RE:i have seen GOD
by suresh pawar on Jul 25, 2007 09:57 AM
indian team consist of eleven players. if u say he is senior than even gangully and dravid and even kumble is senior. every players have to contribute. nobody is god in the game.but for god sake give genuine players a chance to play for their country.
RE:i have seen GOD
by Ranjit Patil on Jul 25, 2007 09:49 AM
why should sachin give his hard earned money to charity...do you give ur monthly income to charity...he is earning that much money bcos he is good at his job...nothing more and nothing less
