Most of time India is good at practice match but when there is a real match India perform poor!!!!! Hope India do better when there is a real TEST.........
It is really a good start by the indian team ahead of the much demanding test matches against the powerful england side.i hope indians will continue their in the matches aginst the england team.i like the way the karhick paced his innings this is very good sign not only for him but also for the entir team as dravid already mentioned that karthick will open in all the test matches.it is business asusual for laxman.he had done so many times for india in the past .i hope he will continue in the future too.jaffer could have scored more than what he had scored.had he scored decent score that would of done his confidence world of good.i fail to comprehend why they didnot pick both sachin and saurov as they play a important part in india's chances of winning the test series.i love to see them play in england .england is their hunting home .so i hope to see them in action soon.
Guys these team IND just playing cricket with ENG backyarders team. Once the IND start playing with regular ENG team will know the real indian team capabality don't worry.
Check out the heading on this page. http://www.rediff.com/cricket/uk07.html This says laxman scored 195, while this page http://www.rediff.com/cricket/2007/jul/08uklead02.htm shows that he scored 95
Rediff should give English Grammer lessons to all their column writers. The heading of this column suggests that after Laxaman got out, Sussex bowlers started getting wickets. Only after reading the article one will know that the tittle is talking about Indian bowlers
RE:Title of this article
by ashish palkar on Jul 09, 2007 12:45 PM
I agree that the heading is confusing ...bowlers strike (indian or sussex ??)after laxman misses ton.
RE:Title of this article
by Sharad Saxena on Jul 09, 2007 03:10 PM
Dear Mr Author, If Rediff accept your suggestion then more than 90 % messages will come under RED TAG
Pls read your message and define the word TITTLE ??
