life is what it becomes when you are planning for something else!!!!!!!!!! you know what i mean laugh out laudly on the dicision of few foolish people ,That's is the only right answer you can give to them....
you guys are a bunch of ... how do you talk about royal bengal tiger and nonsense like that after his dismal performace. He has done a lot for the team.. but now the team needs to move to the next level.. so stop being babies and support the team ..not you little "price"
Dont know the reasons of Zaheer Khan being left out so long. Reasons ofcourse know beetr to Dravid, Chappel and ofcourse sachin.definitely dirty games being played around. Is really dravid serious in building the team for Wcup 2007.If so better work on his knowledge and past experience. there are no bowlers in Indian team to bowl out any opposition twice.ofcourse Anil´and Bhaji are capable to do that. But look ahead we will be going to Pakistan and wonder we can doa nything there. Already England have bitten the dust.Its time for India. With shoaib at his best i hope India can atleast salvage some draw there.
SO Admirers of Dravid and greg better look ahead for the Pak missiles. Mr Kiran More must be feeling good as Pawar is at the helm of affairs. SO more dirty cricket ahead for Indian People
RE:Zaheer Khan
by Prasannaa Ganesan on Jan 11, 2006 07:18 PM
Isnt it already clear already why Zaheer was not picked in the squad. The selection committee now has realized that Sourav is a batsman and not a bowler who could bat. It had taken so long for them to know the fact. Lets assume that the selectors were correct in not picking up Zaheer for a while.. I am sure they would have gone by the performace of the two thereby Sourav getting an edge over ZK. yeah, ZK picked up Sourav's wickets in both innings of a match he played against him, but what did Sourav do, he picked up 5 wickets in the same match and all of them were top-order wickets. Isnt this good enough to leave out ZK????
Dear Mr Ranatunga you are perfectly right when you say Laxman is proven performer and we also believe this but unfortunately if developments during last couple of months in Indian cricket front are any indication then our current cricketing decision makers thinks otherwise as they do not simply beleive in heros, proven etc.Is'nt it?
ya its quit strange that kalu never got time after gloovework as arjuna has mentioned in his column.....Another interesting thing is Adam Gilcrist of Australia is also doing gr8 with bat after his Gloovework........
Saurav Ganguly is the prince of indian cricket and he should be allowed to play with an open mind. the royal bengal tiger will soon be roaring. come on saurav.
As he is the best test performer for india he should be given the crusial no3 position. It is stupidity from the team management that they didnt send him at no3 at day4 of 1st test as he badly need match prctice.
RE:Laxman should be no.3
by bob on Dec 09, 2005 08:34 PM
Please give your phone number to the management. They would consult you the next time they choose their team and the batting order. Also provide your expertise so that they would consult you when the team management has to take an important decision. The best batsman should be able to play in any conditions. If Laxman can ONLY play at No.3, then he should be shelved off. The team management does things differently each time depending on the circumstances.
sangakkara needs time n space to open innings after his glove works....hmmmm........kaluwitharana never got that when arjuna was captain.......strange....
