Discussion Board

Who was better: Federer or Roddick?


Total 200 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
M C
Brain fart?
by M C on Jul 06, 2009 07:45 AM  | Hide replies

"Did Federer deserve to win?" Rediff....time and again you prove that you are a bunch of morons and boneheads. Does the question make any sense? Better of the two won the title today. Stop posting such nonsensical articles/questions.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
anand mehta
Re: Brain fart?
by anand mehta on Jul 06, 2009 08:31 AM
If it was nonsensical, why did you respond MC and waste yr valuable time. The comments of most, for a change are without any sarcastic or abusive language that is the hallmark of response of surfers to most of the other articles. This is how we should respond to the questions of rediff to make the debate useful, in my humble opinion.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Himagirish Rao
R-Fed vs A-Rod
by Himagirish Rao on Jul 06, 2009 07:44 AM

A-Rod was clearly in the zone for most of the game, but R-Fed raised his game just enough when it really mattered. Even at his best, Roddick was eventualy no match for Federer, who himself was clearly below par yesterday.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Laxmipat Surana
Roger Federer vs Any Roddick
by Laxmipat Surana on Jul 06, 2009 07:31 AM

Both are great players. It was not Roddick's day. It was Federer's. But I am yet to know a player who has not lost a service game in a battle fought for over four hours. What a Wimbeldon Final. And sorry to Paes for losing mixed doubles.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
candasamy sacarabany
wimbledon 2009 final
by candasamy sacarabany on Jul 06, 2009 07:29 AM

Andy Roddick played well. But Federer proved he is stronger. Roddick has improved a lot in the past one year and he will reign in 2009.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Balaji Krishnamurthy
Sure he deserved it
by Balaji Krishnamurthy on Jul 06, 2009 07:07 AM

For the most part, Roddick outplayed Federer. But Federer hung in there. In the final analysis one person had to break somewhere. Roddick was the man to break;Federer capitalized. However there is one thing. Federer was not at his best and still managed to win. Would the match have been this close if he was at his best? Anyway great game. Congratulations Fedex; Hard luck A-Rod

    Forward  |  Report abuse
krishan joshi
Qho is better? F oe R
by krishan joshi on Jul 06, 2009 07:05 AM

Its not the question of who is better, its the victory which counts in any game.Its futile to ask such question.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Shake Abdullah
Re: WHO ARE YOU????
by Shake Abdullah on Jul 06, 2009 07:02 AM
Well said ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Srikanth Kurudi
No
by Srikanth Kurudi on Jul 06, 2009 06:02 AM  | Hide replies

Federer could not break roddick serve till the last game, whereas Roddick had broken federer's serve thrice. Roddick was definitely playing better than federer.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
venkat a
Re: No
by venkat a on Jul 06, 2009 07:33 AM
You are Mad !
This is their 21 meeting, out of this Fedx won 19.
So doubt Roddick improved his game and played very well in this match. But Federer simply outplayed him.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Nitin Joshi
Roddick should have won
by Nitin Joshi on Jul 06, 2009 05:58 AM

Roddick should have won. He was the better player for most of the match. He was the one who broke Federers serve twice, while Federer was unable to break Roddicks serve right upto the very end. In the end I think Federer got lucky that he was serving first in the final set. All he had to do was break and it was game over. Credit to Roddick for having played so well. His game has come a long way and I think he will win the next majoh, the US open. Go Roddick!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 200 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message