Missing Shah Rukh & other reasons: Why Tees Maar Khan failed

Re: Why is this author obsessed with Tees Maar Khans supposed fai by Nithin Murali on Dec 29, 2010 03:43 PM BCOZ GUZAARISH AND RAAVAN WERE ATLEAST DECENT MOVIES THOUGH IT FLOPPED AND IT WASNT PROMOTED OR HYPED SHAMELESSLY TO THE EXTENT TMK DID.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Why is this author obsessed with Tees Maar Khans supposed by Heloise on Dec 29, 2010 03:45 PM As far as I can see, every movie nowadays is hyped and promoted relentlessly. Some find ways to do it well and some don't. Does that mean that the movie should be ripped apart like this? Is TMK the only bad movie which was hyped?    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Why is this author obsessed with Tees Maar Khans supposed fai by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:42 PM Exactly.....REDIFF clearly has some hidden vendetta against TMK/Farah/Akshay/...    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Why is this author obsessed with Tees Maar Khans supposed fai by Heloise on Dec 29, 2010 03:43 PM It seems like a systematic and dedicated effort to sabotage the movie. This is not done, no matter how bad the movie is!    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Why SRK??? by sanjiv prasad on Dec 29, 2010 05:58 PM even srk can"t save this movie by his presence ,the story that farah or his crap husband wrote.i think any khan can"t save this movie by acting.if any khan work for this film than every khan will tell .my name is not khan.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Why SRK??? by Nithin Murali on Dec 29, 2010 03:27 PM EXCATLY    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: TMK is bad agree but what the hell they are saying about OSO by Nithin Murali on Dec 29, 2010 03:28 PM shut ur loud mouth. oso was brilliant. It was a jaggernaut and huge in India as well. The highest at that point of time.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: TMK is bad agree but what the hell they are saying about by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:33 PM OSO was brilliant.... Wow, you are even more brilliant than OSO itself...    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: TMK is bad agree but what the hell they are saying about OSO by anand bansod on Dec 29, 2010 10:30 PM Yes ur right... true.. SRK sucks big time    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: TMK is bad agree but what the hell they are saying about OSO by rehan ansari on Dec 29, 2010 03:36 PM Main hoon na was a wholesome entertainer and same was with OSO. And all you SRK haters Akshay cannot match the Charisma of SRK.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: TMK is bad agree but what the hell they are saying about by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:41 PM TMK is as good or bad as MHN and OSO... Singh Is King is also a similar mindless film which was a BIG hit...So don't give the charisma cr@p here.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: TMK is bad agree but what the hell they are saying about by Nithin Murali on Dec 29, 2010 03:44 PM precisely    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: TMK is bad agree but what the hell they are saying about OSO by sanjiv prasad on Dec 29, 2010 06:00 PM then create ur akshay fans over there. this is ours choice whom we will support.then u better be shut ur mouth and put some rod in ur mouth .u crap.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: You have decided it failed? by hari on Dec 29, 2010 03:26 PM nice answer budy keep it up    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: You have decided it failed? by Nithin Murali on Dec 29, 2010 03:29 PM yeah bcoz, mnik is an all time blockbuster in the overseas market and a hit in the indian market because it netted 73.50 crores in total whereas tmk will finish at only 65 crores or less. Thus making it a 5 crore loss to its distributors.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: You have decided it failed? by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:30 PM MNIK was sold for more than 100 crores to FOX, hence, FOX lost their money or max broke even you fool....    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: You have decided it failed? by Kashif Khan on Dec 29, 2010 03:42 PM mnik netted 190 crores worldwide...and fox bought it for 100 crore...simple calvulation...film budget was 38 crore...so both srk,kjo and fox made money.....n film is still releasig in overseas market...in comng days it will cross 200 crore mark..    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: You have decided it failed? by Kashif Khan on Dec 29, 2010 03:42 PM mnik netted 190 crores worldwide...and fox bought it for 100 crore...simple calvulation...film budget was 38 crore...so both srk,kjo and fox made money.....n film is still releasig in overseas market...in comng days it will cross 200 crore mark..    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: You have decided it failed? by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:44 PM Even REDIFF has written in its articles that MNIK was a disaster of the year.... If FOX was so happy then why did they go around saying that the film had bombed....    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: You have decided it failed? by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:46 PM even if I buy your figures....It clearly had less figure than TMK in the first 5 days.... So give TMK the time, why denounce it from day 5.... isn't it clear conspiracy...    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: You have decided it failed? by pink rose on Dec 29, 2010 03:27 PM my name is khan is not an indian favourite because it lacks dancing and colors and srk plays a disabled character , but globaly to audience who like films not for songs and colors and sexy hero it is the greatest film ever, iam from egypt i saw it 5 times and couldnot get enough a brilliant story , director actors, i became srk fan because of mnik and it is the heighest indian film ever film in box office world wide, but tmk is just a normal hindi movie not a global one it might earn more in indian market but not globally.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: You have decided it failed? by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:30 PM Can you tell me what is common between Paa, Ghajini, Koi Mil Gaya, etc... All were super hits in spite of hero playing a disbled character... For a film to be hit it should atleast have a good story...which unfortunately MNIK did not have....    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: You have decided it failed? by pink rose on Dec 29, 2010 03:26 PM my name is khan is not an indian favourite because it lacks dancing and colors and srk plays a disabled character , but globaly to audience who like films not for songs and colors and sexy hero it is the greatest film ever, iam from egypt i saw it 5 times and couldnot get enough a brilliant story , director actors, i became srk fan because of mnik and it is the heighest indian film ever film in box office world wide, but tmk is just a normal hindi movie not a global one it might earn more in indian market but not globally.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Paid Article ......... by md farruq on Dec 29, 2010 03:09 PM What Paid Article you Buffon Srk hasn't said YES to any scripted movies of Sirish Kunder's & he's stood by his desicion. "I am sure you can see the en-result why" SRK was the first one to be offered Jaan-E-Mann, TMK & even forthcoming Joker The answer was one & same to all 'NO    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:31 PM Do you want to say that script of OSO and MHN were masterpeices...:)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by Nithin Murali on Dec 29, 2010 03:30 PM excatly- SRK WAS ALWAYS RIGHT IN REFUSING THAT STUPID IDIOTIC SHIRISH    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Paid Article ......... by Sunil Tiwari on Dec 29, 2010 02:59 PM Absolutely paid..Rediff should do such paid journalism in style..not like missing SRK. ( outright cheap).    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by navneet sharma on Dec 29, 2010 03:03 PM I agree. SRK must have paid media to write such stories    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by aishwarya jaiswal on Dec 29, 2010 03:12 PM Have u seen the movie,u cant bear it i have left the hall in interval. all reviews r true and movie is a disaster    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by Jitender Srivastava on Dec 29, 2010 03:25 PM I am not a fan of SRK, Akshay or Aamir, but I, including all, must accept that only SRK (not even Aamir) has been able to make a bad movie a super hit (in terms of box office collections). May be Aamir now can match SRK.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:27 PM Yes that is why Billu was a SUPER HIT....and so was PAHELI..... Though the latter was a decent film, yet it was far from being a hit... Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by DrTarique Mansoor on Dec 29, 2010 04:33 PM Dont forget both Paheli and Billu Barber had a moral theme and good story. SRK was good enough in both. Both the movies are watchable contrary to Box office collections. Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:26 PM TMK is as good(or bad) as OSO and MHN...    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by Hmm on Dec 29, 2010 03:25 PM very true.. how can one decide success or failure in the initial few days when collections have been decent..    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by Nithin Murali on Dec 29, 2010 03:32 PM BUT THE COLLECTIONS HAVE FELL TO AN ALL TIME LOW. IT IS GOING TO BE ABOVE AVERAGE.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by Opinionated Man on Dec 29, 2010 03:34 PM Let the weekend come, and then decide...no new film is coming...    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Paid Article ......... by pankaj on Dec 29, 2010 04:32 PM yes it is true that collections of TMK has falled all time low. but why cause everyone is so free and intellecutal dat everywhere is huge negative marketing for TMK. From the day 1 while it was the second biggest opening of indian cinema. still everyone is saying it is d biggest flop. Forward   |   Report abuse