People here once again are doing what they did in Aarushi case. Media comes out with some non-evidence based stuff and people react in frenzy. All here are very nice people who never committed any crime. At least allow the allegations to be proved before showing your holier-than-thou attitude!
Re: Re: Arushi case
by k j on Jun 29, 2009 12:16 PM Permalink
Very shameful thing for a star? Its not shameful if it was not a star who had done that? The act is shameful, be it a star, be it a commoner or be it god almighty.
Re: Arushi case
by Lucky B on Jun 24, 2009 01:46 AM Permalink
Then how can Shiney's wife start coming out in media? The poor maid doesn't have any spokesperson for her.
Lots of Bollywood personality started giving him certificate. Bur poor maid doesn't have support, even from so called NGOs.
Even its a consent sex, the way his wife is accepting it, looks like they all sex addict and do not worry about others to fulfill their fantasies.
Re: Arushi case
by mary seven on Jun 23, 2009 08:39 PM Permalink
i agree. is the polics a�ed to open their mouth while the matter is sub judice? it invokes media trial and adversely influences the judge.
Riyadh: Saudi Arabia's Interior Ministry said authorities beheaded a Saudi man convicted of molesting a child and leaving him in the desert to die.
According to a ministry statement on Sunday, Falih bin Miflih was beheaded in Unayzah town in Al Qasim province.
Saudi Arabia follows a strict interpretation of Islam under which people convicted of murder, drug trafficking, rape and armed robbery can be executed - usually with a sword.
According to an Associated Press count, the execution brought the number of beheadings in the kingdom this year to 42. Last year, 102 people were beheaded.
Re: this shld be justice
by Vishwas Joshi on Jun 22, 2009 06:38 PM Permalink
oye sardar - even after beheading a man was he still alive??? to leave him in desert to die???? very funny of you Mr.Sardar
Re: Re: this shld be justice
by Loan Shark on Jun 22, 2009 08:21 PM Permalink
LOL ... read again .... the child was molested by the accused and then left to die
Re: Re: this shld be justice
by mayank anand on Jun 23, 2009 06:03 AM Permalink
Dude, better read properly before making any lame comment like that. He said, the saudi man molested a child and left him (the child) in the desert to die.
Re: this shld be justice
by neelima neelima on Jun 22, 2009 12:47 AM Permalink
Great justice! Who knows how many of them were innocent. Please stay in Saudi if you admire this medieval justice.
Re: Re: this shld be justice
by A K on Jun 24, 2009 01:11 PM Permalink
This is in reply to neelima post. She thinks that in Saudi Arabia it is a jungle law. If anybody does capital crime they just catch him/her and chop their heads. Please understand it is not the way you think. The criminal goes under rigrous trial. They collect witnesses based on solid proof. It goes to Supreme Court then finally it goes to the King for his signature. The King then tries to check if victimes family agree for forgiveness and if not then the beheading is taken place.
Re: Re: this shld be justice
by tajender on Jun 22, 2009 04:36 AM Permalink
hardly anyone.delay in justice is denial of justice.islamic justice is dtterent as well.
Re: Re: Re: this shld be justice
by Lucky B on Jun 24, 2009 01:49 AM Permalink
Your all Islaamic countries are great. They treat woman and criminal alike. A man can marry even six years old. What a law?
Re: shiney
by madhukar a on Jun 22, 2009 11:37 PM Permalink
hahaha very funny! here are some more from me: What were shiney's last words before heading to jail? Bai-Bai What would Shiney do after coming out of his term in jail? He will spread bai-chara!
Shiney new signature: Made by MumBai, destroyed by Bai.
Re: shiney
by Alok Bhatt on Jun 22, 2009 07:01 PM Permalink
The joke may seem funny... but are in poor taste.. they are harsh to both the maid and Shiney
What was Mahesh Bhatt doing there? Trying to destroy the evidence !! Its is known that he is partial to the Shiny Ahuja and shouldn't have been allowed there..
Re: NCW meeting- Mahesh Bhatt
by Pat Thakur on Jun 21, 2009 08:05 PM Permalink
Bhatt was trying to save Ahuja's Butt..... Or he was just trying to make Shiney talk in detail on this subject; maybe a new script is on the cards.
But has'nt all the evidence that is required for the case been already acquired, or are the courts waiting for somethnig else?
It is time the court judges were adjudged on strike rates. I mean the girl is there, the medical report is there, the guy is there so what exactly are the courtsw waiting for - are they some archeological findings!
The judicial system in India is a charade and skewed blatantly towards big shots.
Now I do not know what the truth is, but all the media channels showing the accused's wife in a sympathethic light, implying as if Mr. ahuja is incapable of commiting lewd crimes is pathetic. Why not show the plight of the accuser's family. This imbalance in coverage is like moulding public opinion. If the courts feel banning pre election opinion polls is correct then why allow this media defense or attack on cases sub-judice.
On 2nd July, Shiney Ahuja would get a bail and the media would cover how he has spent his day and ask him question about his 'ordeal' in the police jail.
The girl would be forgotten and in a couple of months would take her case back saying that she is delusional and had a crush on Shiney. She is sorry and Shiney would forget and forgive!
Its not the politicians but the courts that are lethargic. They cannot decide in time. Whether it is a benefit of doubt or a conviction.
Re: Courts are to blame
by smita george on Jun 24, 2009 02:19 PM Permalink
Well said..couldnt agree with u more..truly justice delayed is justice denied
Re: Courts are to blame
by Ashwin on Jun 20, 2009 08:39 AM Permalink
VERY WELL & PRECISELY SAID. BUT YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN TO MENTION, HOW MANY PEOPLE, IN POLICE & COURTS WITH GET RICH, AT THE COST OF THE POOR MAID.
NCW Chief Girija Vyas is convinced the maid was raped. She played the judge, jury and executioner for Shiney Ahuja and condemned him as a rapist at a press conference on Friday.
Ans I thought police supposed to investigate, obtain evidence and present them to court. Court is supposed to decide on the merits of the case and in the light of the evidence presented to court by the police and defence. Press is supposed to report on the proceedings of the case and general public can have whatever opinion they have without any bearing of such opinion on the judgement. Or I was just dreaming about the civic society?
