how can u expect a good review from rediff if its not a karan johar movie or SRK is not there in the movie .. Before villu release the same rediff said vijay is a telugu superstar ..
Rediff, pls dont write ur own reviews without understanding the language or the movie, instead Better copy & paste the reviews from some other good sites like indiaglitz.com,behindwoods.com
When i saw the title 'Nan Kadavul lacks punch' i quickly scrolled down to check the number of stars - expecting a one or a two. but to my surprise it is a 3 star - which is good. Why should a movie that is classified as 'quite good' get a title so negative ? Dont assume that every body in this world reads the whole review - especially the rediff reviews that are full of spoilers. Many of the readers just look at the review title and the stars - which in this case is quite contradicting.
Rediff - why dont u guys show some consistency within the same page at least. And just by crtiquing a good movie i dont think so what u guys are going to achieve !
Re: Pavithra - do u have a split personality ?
by ganesh kunjithapatham on Feb 06, 2009 10:19 PM
rediff they said sivaji was rocking but i had a bad rocking headache.if u apply your logic what logic shivaji or pokkiri had.These movies like Naan kadavul had to be absorbrd asssimilateed and to be reviewed later rather than analyse it than and there.most of us had felt the dicomfort when you saw Mahanadhi(kamal).this is half baked review and muddled one.
Re: Pavithra - do u have a split personality ?
by Neel S on Feb 06, 2009 06:46 PM
Blame it on the intelligent Rediff editor, guys! Often, these guys randomly pick up one phrase from the review and make it the title. Had it been a Yash Chopra or a Karan Johar film, it would have a different title, of course.
