Sonia gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi, they are not Gandhi atall, they are Khans, they are children of Muslim man from Junaghadh, nemed Firoz ,he was Khan not Gandhi, Gandhi was his Aduopted Sir name to get Elected in INDIAN Parlament, this is true, Belive me one day if CONGRESS geting elected like that , INDIA might become one big muslim nation, so GUJARAT people Beware of that CONGRESS, not going to VOTE for them. JAI GUJARAT,
RE:RE:about gandhi family
by Virendra Sharma on Dec 09, 2007 06:53 AM Permalink
Stop this bull shit Hasu. No lies, even if repeated by thousands of time can over come the TRUTH.
If you have proof to prove that Rajiv's father was not a Gandhi but a Khan, prove it or SHUT UP.
People like you and Narendra Modi are not Hindus or friends of Hindus but enemies of Hindus. A Hindu is a peaceloveing and compassionate human being, not a lier and narrow minded bigot.
Major (Retd) Virendra Sharma Wellington New Zealand
RE:about gandhi family
by Satyam Shah on Dec 09, 2007 04:26 PM Permalink
Then why only Hindu are killed in Kashmir? Why so many Soldier of India are killed in J&K? U r army personal. Why there is no Hindu country in the world while the Hindu community is biiggeest in the world? Why
RE:RE:RE:about gandhi family
by Aryan on Dec 09, 2007 07:00 AM Permalink
Mr Major, You are a Retd Major and living in a foreign country. Can't u live in our country? Just sitting there and posting messages. You should first stop doing this. You dont have right to post any messages and u as a irresponsible citizen (not serving to poor people) relaxing in white trash country. Come back to our motherland and serve your fellow citizens. Atleast work for your jawans whose salaries are very low. You dont have any moral right to poke in to indian affairs.
RE:about gandhi family
by Mat on Dec 10, 2007 08:25 PM Permalink
That way majority of Indians in the U.S are Gujjuus. Why do not they come back to India to "serve" the indians and the poor instead of serving white trash.
RE:about gandhi family
by ak on Dec 09, 2007 07:14 AM Permalink
dear major it is true that Indira Gandhi was married to Firoz a Parasi not a Muslim and Jawaharlal Nehru was opposed to this marriage and when Mahatma Gandhi give his name and adopted Firoz only then Nehru aggreed to marriage.
RE:about gandhi family
by immagina on Dec 09, 2007 10:45 PM Permalink
my firoz gandhi was firoz daaruwala, he was indeed a parsee Gandhi is their surrogate surname , it put on
RE:about gandhi family
by tribhuwan sahu on Dec 10, 2007 11:19 AM Permalink
Dear Mr. Sharma , I want to bring to your knowledge that father of shri Rajiv (& husband of Mrs. Indira gandhi ) was Mr. Firoz khan , who was not bearing any gandhi surname . Initially this marriage was not acceptable to nehru family ( i.e. Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru ) , Hence Mahatma Gandhi interfered and advised/gave to use his surname .-----by T.L.SAHU Hyderabad A.P.
RE:about gandhi family
by Hasu Patel on Dec 10, 2007 09:56 PM Permalink
hi tribhuan sahu , i am glad you agree with me ,thank you very much, JAI GUJARAT.
RE:VOTE FOR BJP AND MODI
by Satyam Shah on Dec 09, 2007 04:29 PM Permalink
I am with you. All True Hindu are with you. IF anyone want that their next generation may live happily are with you
RE:VOTE FOR BJP AND MODI
by VIPUL PATHAK on Dec 10, 2007 07:05 AM Permalink
yes dear u r right. jitega gujarat. not only hindu card but he prooved through development of gujrat, as gujarat is no-1 state in india.
The rioters of the 1984 Sikh carnage, in which over 3000 people were killed in Delhi, were apparently paid Rs 500 for each person they killed, a new book on the riots reveals, reinforcing the allegation that the violence far from being spontaneous was the outcome of a conspiracy.
The book, titled When A Tree Shook Delhi, written by journalist Manoj Mitta and advocate for many of the riot victims' families, H S Phoolka, claims to give an "uncensored" insight into the events. The book traces the genesis of the violence through eyewitness accounts and the investigations by Phoolka as counsel for victims.
Quoting from the affidavit of war widow Joginder Kaur, the book says when the police was taking her, along with her two sons, to a safe place to protect them from the rage of the rioters, she saw members of a mob remonstrating with the police inspector that, by shielding her two sons he was ''putting them at a loss of Rs 500 each''. The members were so upset about their monetary loss that, at that point, the policemen had to draw out their revolvers and threaten to fire at the mob.
It was a tell-tale evidence, preciously scarce, of the manner in which the violence had been organised. Rioters were paid and they were paid in proportion to the number of Sikhs killed by them, the author says.
The pay-offs issue reinforces the allegation that the violence, far from being spontaneous, was the outcome of a high-level conspiracy. However, Justice Ranganath Misra Commission,
RE:Merchant of death
by anand bhalerao on Dec 09, 2007 10:52 AM Permalink
CONGRESS HAS KILLED THOUSANDS OF SIKHS IN 1984 THEY DONT HAVE ANY MORAL RIGHT TO BLAME MODI
Friends, Do you guys ever see talking these two leaders without their paper at public meetings? Rahul....is a child ...need to pay lot of money on PA's for preparing their speeches. I heard EC issued a notice to Congress party for their remarks on Gujarat CM. EC has to issue notice to Sonia's PA who prepare the speeches. Sonia is a poor lady ...soemtimes, she reads the wrong paper speeches. She critised about Communists in Haryana and later Congress clarified that the speech is not supposed to be presented there. what a pity on our nation? All congress lovers, i want to call you as Slaves because how big or hardwork you do in the party...u wont get recognition...the person like rahul can ride on u.
Friends, Do you guys ever heard any allegation on Modi for the corruption or amassing lot of property like Lalu, Karunanidhi, Sonia, Rahul, Mualayam, Mayavathi, Rajasekhar Reddy,....(the list goes on....). How Sonia and Rahul are earning money? Or they just living on their MP salaries? What work / business they do other than just a member of parliament? Are they ever announced their property to public? Narendra Modi is a clean person and believes in principles whatever he learned in his childhood. WHoever is raising the revolt against him are pure opportunists and unsuccessful ambitioners. Keshubai is angry because of his hungry to power and Suresh Mehta (does he have any followers???). Opportunities will not come to your plate ..you have to work hard to get those fruits I strongly urge people of Gujarat to vote for Modi for his clean image and able leadership. Vaghela (Ex RSS follower) is the face of Congress....Seven BJP MLAs are got the tickets of Congress. If the BJP is so communal, how come these MLAs become secular overnight by joining in Congress?
RE:Any corruption charges on Modi?
by hello on Dec 09, 2007 04:30 PM Permalink
if someone has filled hatred in a human being doesnt mean that the person cannot be shown True path
RE:Any corruption charges on Modi?
by mahendra nayak on Dec 10, 2007 09:53 PM Permalink
First you should allow your opponents to speak then only charges will be laid. His own partymen are in danger.
We should at least appreciate the single minded and single handed drive of Mr Vrajesh Vyas to rid Gujarat of Modi. You may or may not be successful, Mr Vyas, but your concern has to be appreciated. Good luck.
Gujarat will be better off without Modi. He has done nothing in the past nine years for the common man. He has supported the industrialists following the footsteps of his mentors in Delhi. Dalits, Muslims, and down trodden like fishermen folks are living still below poverty line. Let him come out with statistics of good things he has done to uplift this neglected communities in the state of Gujarat. He has not even developed good roads there, villages still do not have good school buildings. He has neglected the many important sectors. Everthing is in print but he gives a rosy picture of Gujarat. Its a lop sided one. The other side of the coin says he has neglected the people of Gujarat. He has done one thing that is creating terror in the state. All his safron brigade are roaming freely even after their indulgence in the post godra riots. BJP and Modi have to answer for their crime against humanity. They must confess as Modi has confessed to extra judicial killing in a fake encounter of Shorabuddin. He is already in deep trouble for his unsavoury comments unbecoming of the highest office he holds. Such a leader is not trust worthy and the people of Gujarat will vote him out soon. The winds of change are blowing in Congress direction as rightly pointed out by PM, the other night. It is for sure that Congress will win handsomely not because it is good but because Modi is utterly a bad element in Gujarat. Not a supporter of Congress but wish to see Modi out for all time to come
RE:RE:Gujarat sans Modi
by jamsheed abumohammed on Dec 09, 2007 08:13 AM Permalink
Look at the language used by this so called Modi supporter from Gujarat. It speaks of his state of mind and that of Modki. If facts are not digestable come out with facts on hand. Modi is being condemned by all politicians for his unwarranted and unsavoury remarks about fake encounter. These remarks not only put him in dock but also he is liable crimnally. He must be debarred from contesting elections in future. EC has rightly taken notice of it and SC will hear it on Monday. The cat will be out of bag soon. This will bring down the image of BJP altogether. The BJP leadership has totally surrendered to this highly contaminated leadership of Modi. This shows the bankruptsy of the leadership of BJP. What else his supporters can do unable to defend him, indulge in mudslinging and dragging the religion of the writer. This only speaks about the state of mind in the BJP supporters camp. These people should come out with bare facts if any development has taken place in Gujarat. See how he has tarnished the fair image of India in the comity of nations. He and BJP are answerable to the people of the country. They must immediatley apologise to the nation for all the misdeeds they did to undermine the secular fabric of this country which the founder father has so judiciously carved it. In a land of ahimsa and Gandhi, such a "Merchant of Death" has born to pull down the image of the state as well as the country. His supporters are headless chickens roaming around with no remorse.
