Dear friends, here is the new senstaional news, our kalamji did not have the chance to sign the papers of Afzal Guru, WHAT A BLUNDER BLOODY ITALIAN MADAM. Had Thackrey known about this, i dont think he would have supported UPA candidate. Now Sonia is answerable to the people of India. This is a clear plot by congress to save AFZAL GURU. SHAME ON CONGRESS. I feel definitely INDIA IS NOT IN SAFE HANDS NOW. WE ARE BEING CONTGROLLED BY ITALIAN. SHAME SHAME SHAME SHAME SHAME WHO HAVE ELECTED HER GOVT.
WHY BLAME THE POOR ITALIAN WOMAN ? ITS OBVIOUS THAT THE BROWN INDIAN MEN LOVE WHITE FOREIGN WOMEN IN PREFRENCE TO BROWN INDIAN WOMEN. EG. NEHRU WITH AN ENGLISH WOMAN, RAJIV WITH AN ITALIAN WOMAN AND NOW THE LITTLE RAHUL WITH A SPANISH WOMAN.
ALL THESE BOLLYWOOD ACTRESES ARE TRYING DESPERATELY TO IMITATE WHITE WOMEN EG. AISWARYA, SHILPA.
KEEP A OLD SENILE PERSON SUCH AS VAJPAYEE OR ABDUL KALAM AS PRIME MINSTER/PRESIDENT IF YOU DONT WANT THEM TO BRING BACK WHITE FOREIGN WOMEN TO RULE THE COUUNTRY !
RE:WHAT A BLUNDER
by mandar joshi on Jul 27, 2007 06:44 PM Permalink
Mr.Thakrey also did support for Ms.patil, just to show people that Shiv sena resepects marathi people and grab as most as Marathi votes.
RE:WHAT A BLUNDER
by ravi g on Jul 27, 2007 06:51 PM Permalink
ATleast now political party acats biased shall learn a lesson, our main should be the overall interests of our country
RE:WHAT A BLUNDER
by Abhishek Sinha on Jul 27, 2007 06:57 PM Permalink
The congress played a good trick. They did not send the paper of Afzal to the President and now as they have their puppet intalled now whatever Madam S wants will be done and they will project a psudo secular face. I don't know when muslim's of india will understand the tactis of congress. They could not do anything in past 50 yrs what they gonna do now?????
RE:WHAT A BLUNDER
by mandar joshi on Jul 27, 2007 06:43 PM Permalink
Mr.Ravi, all these things are well known to All TOP Politcial parties and membcer,
it is strange that the home ministry, to whom kalam sent the papers of afzal's mercy plea for their comments, did not return the same. many people used to think that kalam has not taken a decision. but actually home ministry is at fault. they do not want afzal to b hanged as decided by sc. it is minority appeasement of the highest order. or is shivraj patil, so inefficient, as pointed out by left, when sonia strongly wanted to make him the president?
Mr.Bal Thakre has not favoured Mr. Kalam for second time only because of the delay in deciding on the mercy plea of Mohammed Afzal Guru, facing a death sentence for his role in the terror attack on Parliament. Now when Mr. Kalam has made clear that he has not received back the same from Govt., Mr. Thakre must regret his decission
RE:Mr.Bal Thakre had not favoured Mr. Kalam
by m ganesh on Jul 27, 2007 06:38 PM Permalink
Kalam should never have been made the president instead he should have been asked to make missile instead. He was a rubber stamp president and all Indian president's will continue to be in future. India's dirty politicians want such a president always.
RE:Mr.Bal Thakre had not favoured Mr. Kalam
by Krishna Mohan on Jul 27, 2007 06:42 PM Permalink
I think you have not seen rubber stamp president like Gyaniji
RE:RE:Mr.Bal Thakre had not favoured Mr. Kalam
by m ganesh on Jul 27, 2007 06:48 PM Permalink
He did revolt at Rajivji at one point of time and he did want Rajiv to be the PM in the first place. There were so many differences with Rajiv Gandhi if you remember.
RE:Mr.Bal Thakre had not favoured Mr. Kalam
by R A Sharma on Jul 27, 2007 07:20 PM Permalink
dear m
u r wrong. kalam was not a rubber stamp president. he had returned the office of profit bill, which was aimed at saving sonia and other MPs. though sonia also enacted the drama of resigning and getting reelected from her pet seat of amethi, wasting lot of public money unnecesarily.
RE:Mr.Bal Thakre had not favoured Mr. Kalam
by ravi g on Jul 27, 2007 06:40 PM Permalink
Mr. Ganesh never ever use the word Rubber stamp to kalam, he was never given the chance to sign the paper, kindly try to understand the situation. It has once again proved, that throughout his tenure of president, this was the only flaw people were pointing, even now that is cleared. JUST GREAT KALAM.
RE:Mr.Bal Thakre had not favoured Mr. Kalam
by m ganesh on Jul 27, 2007 06:47 PM Permalink
If he was not as you say then he should have taken care to see that people like Afzal are hanged or soon some amendment should ne made in the constitution where these terrorists are hanged immediately and not take 5 or 10 years. Do you think you can commit a similar crime in Saudi Arabia and be pardoned. No instead they hang a person the same friday and send mutton parcel to India. I am sorry.
RE:RE:Mr.Bal Thakre had not favoured Mr. Kalam
by R A Sharma on Jul 27, 2007 07:23 PM Permalink
dear m
for that u cannot blame kalam. u have to blame the politicians. upa even withdrew pota to appease the minority. president does not have power to make laws. he just signs them or can at best once return them.
Well Mr.Kalam is always right.. he is a man who knows the strength of a common man and come on guys he is not a politician after all. He was the first person in higher authorities who disclosed his dissatisfaction against the Gujrat Riots. And that too BJP was the goverment runner in that state and at the center also, at that particular point of time. Moreover he has got nothing to do with the politics from now, as he is back to his profession, teaching. But thanks to his frankness, which brought out the actual colour of Congress "ONCE AGAIN". Am sure Congress is not going to be back at the center after this tenure and whatever they do from now, will be under strict vigilance of the nation.
It is obvious from the interview that there were impediments, purposely put forth by the UPA government, and an incompetent Home Ministry resulting in President Kalam's decision on Afzal Guru. Even the President rule in Bihar was a unique process where PM Manmohan Singh spoke bunch of lies which led to the dissolution of the State assembly. Dr. Kalam has aptly spoken and it will take another 1000 years before the country is free from the tainted politicians who have their own axe to grind. Even people like Dr. Manmohan Singh now stands arms in arms with the tainted, and hence his own stature is blemished. God save India.
RE:Impediments in his role as President!
by Pratap Bhanja on Jul 27, 2007 06:43 PM Permalink
Good observation. This is the apathy with us in India. Now, wait & watch.. our new president would act like a toy in the hand of UPA, especially SG.
RE:Kalam is an opportunist.
by Krishna Mohan on Jul 27, 2007 06:37 PM Permalink
The big thing is not in becoming a MP, but to place before the nation a plan for development, show a vision, which a man of Mr. Kalam's calibre can oly do, not corrupt MPs.
RE:Kalam is an opportunist.
by Pratap Bhanja on Jul 27, 2007 06:39 PM Permalink
You smell stink. Shit. How far you know Dr. Kalam? How you know that Bajpayee is winning election by muscle power? Prove it.
RE:Kalam is an opportunist.
by Pratap Bhanja on Jul 27, 2007 06:41 PM Permalink
Jingaru dear. as your name suggests you are a rotten bear now that stinks.
RE:Kalam is an opportunist
by ASHUTOSH on Jul 27, 2007 06:38 PM Permalink
You said....""I agree that there are people like Advani, Vajpayee, Sushma Swaraj etc. who win election solely based on goondagiri and money/muscle power. But on the other hand, there are people like P. Chidambara, Mani Shankar Aiyar, Late Sunil Dutt etc"" This means only BJP people are winnig on basis on GOOndagiri, dont you think it a bit myopic.How many seats BJP has in parliament even if all of them are won by Goondagiri that still leaves a lot of seats for your so called Moral knights.So why i see goondagiri inpolitics all around me.I guess BJP has some harry potter wizardry done thats why all the wrong in India is done by them and Congress in unable to do anything. YOu also say Kalam is opportunist, wow..nice assertion but you gave just one proof of that i am sure you will have many more to share so Mani Shankar Aiyar, Late Sunil Duttplease share with us. And also share the good deeds of Mani Shankar Aiyar, Late Sunil Dutt, please we need to make a knowledgebal decision here.....
RE:Kalam is an opportunist
by Suresh Menon on Jul 27, 2007 06:35 PM Permalink
Duh! You go again with the same blabbering. You sound like a typical congressman, devoted fully in the worship of the Gandhis and hungrily lapping up anything let out by them. You choose to be blind to the sentiments of the common man.
The goondagiri that congress has aided, abetted and sponsored has had no parallels in the entire Indian history. Look before you leap.
RE:Guru
by Anil Vidyadharan on Jul 27, 2007 06:35 PM Permalink
hmmm.... interesting point of view. In fact, thats why I want Afzal to get the Death Sentence....'cos he missed !! LOL
i know ,that not only congress or so called pesudo secular parties will not hesitate to give mercy or free hand to minorities because of vote bank, if they do they will loose their position.come whatever may, but minority and terorist should be spared by upa govt.Congress has done nothing for other communities since independance.now everybody can watch on tv their clarification on this note of ex .prez.yanhan sab chalta hai bhai.
RE:mercy plea
by Rocky Marciano on Jul 27, 2007 06:32 PM Permalink
congress has done nothing for other communities from independence! what a lie! then why have 85% hindus voted for and are still voting for congress?
