Periyar was a siriyar in thoughts .his thoughyts were different but spoiled the society as whole.he had no ethos.he was a hypocrite trying to change ,but more he preached anti brahminism more inclined people became to the same.what effect he made on the society except a herd of black sheeps like veeramani's.it helps the vote bank of the so called dravidian politicians.like karunanidhi.but karunanidhi is intelligent enough that he and his coterie used the periyar idelogy for vote bank and captured the media business for his family bank
RE:Periyar was a siriyar in thoughts
by swaroop tagore on Apr 30, 2007 12:49 PM Permalink
HOW DO U BRAHMINS USE TO TREAT A YOUNG WIDOW SHE WAS SENT TO A CORNER THAT WAS HER LIFE WHAT DID PERIYAR PREACH?HAVE U BEEN TO THE FAMILY COURT CHANDRAMOULI AND TAKE STOCK OF BRAHMIN GIRLS OPTING FOR DIVORCE AND OF COURSE SEEK GREENER PASTYRES FOR REMARRIAGE THE WIDOWS COME OUT BOLD FOR REMARRIAGE UR BRAHMIN COMMUNITY ITSELF HAS BENEFITTED OF THE REFORMS OF EVR ,KARUNANIDHI IS OF COURSE A SEASONED POLITICIAN AND ASTUTE IF HE IS HANDLING THE LIKES OF JAYALALITHA AND CHO RAMASAMY OR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY HE IS DEFINITELY OF A DIFFERENT STOCK . WHAT WERE THE BENEFITS REAPED BY THE PEOPLE OF TAMIL NADU DURING THE CONGRESS RULE? WAS IT BETTER THAN THE DRAVIDIAN GOVERNMENTS? NO NEVER, IF PEOPLE VOTE FOR THE DRAVIDIAN PARTIES THE PARTIES MADE SURE TAMILS HAVE DIFFERENT IDENTITY, THEY SAID DONT IMPOSE HINDI WHATS WRONG? LEARING HINDI ON OUR OWN ACCORD IS SUMTHING DIFFERENT AND THAT OF COURSE WILL HELP US COMMUNICATE WITH THE REST OF INDIA. WE LIVE IN A FEDERAL DEMOCRACY WHERE ONE LANGUAGE CANNOT BE PROCLAIMED AS THE NATIONAL LANGUAGE. THE PEOPLE HAVE CONSTANTLY CHOSEN KARUNANIDHI FOR HIS SKILLS AS CHIEF MINISTER THE SAME APPLIES TO JAYALALITHA AND LATE MGR TOO.JAYALAITHA IS NOT A DRAVIDIAN LEADER SHE IS A BRAHMIN BUT MORE DISTINCTLY TAMIL.
