This is yet another extemely painful show of the victim and the marauder switching their roles. I don't believe such a man had to go to this length to sleep with a second-rate female, to hell with image, career, family and reputation. What might have happened is anybody's guess : this girl might have been found vulnerable and he went ahead and dared to workout some fun; that's about it. It takes beasty callousness and an alarming predatory sense on part of pseudo-moral media and parochial legal system to bedevil a man for the lone crime of being a celebrity and that he was humane enough for a confession. I don't think he deserves this treatment atleast until he is proven guilty.
Re: Shame on..who ?!
by mo anj on Jun 15, 2009 06:44 PM Permalink
your posting shows your cheap thoughts like categorizing women like that "second-rate female" first of all and secondly celebritys definitely deserve to such treatment as we give them extra ordinary status and more over why should he be proved when he has confessed
Re: Re: Shame on..who ?!
by Russellian on Jun 15, 2009 06:55 PM Permalink
You got me wrong. I am not so stamping this female for her economic or social position but for she might have appeared to a man - any man for that matter. I think here there is a need to tackle this from a classical man-woman stand-point and to keep off from media-inflated slumdof-female-violated-by-ivory-tower-star temptation. No. I am pretty sure that, if anything, what happened that day would be nothing more than this girl falling prey to his manhood and looks, much less for his power and money. But it takes a lot of gumption to say this aloud, in our sadly hypocritical society.
