Periyar was fomenting social unrest till he lived. Physical attack on Brahmins is the legacy developed by Periyar.
Any Social prevailing in the world has inherent drawbacks and modification have been brought with proper maturity and keeping the dignity of citizens.
He shown more hostility towards the social system than needful and balance appraoch. He against independence and want to become henchman of English. He is kannadiga by birth did not honour either Kannada or tamil language.
He brought self interested leaders like Annadurai, Karunanidhi and veeramani who have demaged tamil nadu and will take more than 100 years to recover from social unrest.
Mr Gynasekharan wasting his time like Periyar stirring the Garbage gets nothing.
U.G. Krishnamurthy also strived for social cause better than Periyar. He is no more now. Besides he does not want followers and missioneries and any other oraganisation like Dravidar Kazhagam to act as mouth piece.
Periyar is against Brahmins only and close friend other castes hindus to survive his cause. He has no guts to oppose other religions if it has many drawbacks. Whereas UGK has more dynamic than Periyar widely honoured persons in in the universe.
Periyar appraoch is problems are outside to be tackeled and set right. The problems are in the heart inside. To conclude Periyar himself is the problem to himself.
