Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:for the bostonpunekar;
by BostonPunekar on May 01, 2007 10:14 PM

you are forgetting 3 things very convinently wihch the constitution has said and when I say those u will unfortunately will have to eat your own words.

1>>Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar in the constitution had said that reservation be given for SC's and STs for 10 years only. And that it be discontinued after 10 years after they are implemented.Its 60 years after the reservation policy and its still being continued..so tell me what is unconstitutional, following what is given constitution , or convinently ignoring whats there for own selfish gains.

2>> Reservation was to be given to untouchables and that had included the SC's , the B.C's and the ST's. There is absulutely no mention whatsoever of OBC's in the constitution. O.B.C's were added as a conviniently and electoraly suitable class to gain political milage. OBC's were never untouchables.

3>> Reservation should never increase the 50% mark is what the constitution says.How can you have 89% reservation?? So making 89% percent reserved seats how are you following the constitution????

I really feel so soory for you. Now you have to eat your words...!


    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Nobody can be like Periyar'