In cases involving crimes of passion/sex it is difficult to prove one thing or the other, albeit in this case, based on media reports, Shiney looks 'not so shiney'. But if they have DNA evidence the act itself can be established. The case then boils down to establishing the circumstances. In film-world setting, casting couches are not that uncommon. I wonder if they administer polygraph tests in India in such cases. In the absence of witnesses it boils down to what he said vs what she said. There have been cases where guys have been led on to the brink only to have the breaks slammed down to extract some material price. On the flip side, there have been well placed guys who have exploited the poor for their own nefarious ends. I guess we will have to wait until all the facts are out before we can reach anly clear verdict. Based on the preliminary evidence in the media, this guy looks guilty.
