Re: Re: Rivalry
by rocky on Apr 14, 2014 05:04 PM
unfortunately, Nadal's fan is losing unlike Nadal... thats the fact... you are a loser.... hope you now realize that I have outsmarted you
An unopposed victory is different from a victory in a contested match. Nole didn't BEAT Nishikori..he got a walk-over. Anyway I'm not interested in your second bet..it is just your attempt to justify returning with your discredited avatar. onestly I don't care. Jst because you claimed you WON your second bet, pointed out that you didn't. Anyway since you are living your life on Wikipedia...maybe you can find out what If Nadal wins the USOpen I'll quit coming to the forums' means in normal people's language?Cowardly liar.
Re: @RockyTARD
by rocky on Apr 08, 2014 12:42 PM
AnuraugTARD, you are the biggest coward... because you didn't put in your stake in both my bets... but interested in the outcome to be your victory....
In my second bet, I said 'Djoko will win against Nishikori' and he did by walk-over.... I did not say 'Djoko will beat Nishi'... again you misinterpreted
Walk-over is the awarding of a victory to a contestant because there are no other contestants, or because the other contestants have been disqualified or have forfeited.
The term is also used in tennis, in reference to a player's unopposed victory as a result of the opponent failing to start the match for any reason, such as injury.
Re: @AnuraugTARD... now read the definition of walk-over
by rocky on Apr 08, 2014 12:02 PM
my second bet was 'djokovic will win against nishikori'... and he did by walk-over.... only thing is match is not considered for h2h stats.... but its unopposed victory to djoko.
The problem is that you consider different ids as different people. So your own fake ids like 'Guest and anuraug rathor'clarifying the bet and supporting you is not a big deal. Let any neutral person opine on this issue I have no issues with that.But not your own fake ids.One person posting under different ids does not constitute multiple people like you are suggesting to justify your loss.
Re: @Rockytard
by rocky on Apr 08, 2014 11:22 AM
AnuragTARD, let me be clear once again.... I'm not going to quit blogging... you were a coward, you didn't put in your stake in my second bet... I clearly challenged you.. now I have won
no more explanations to you...I will blog as rocky as long as I have inter-net access
Re: Re: @Rockytard
by rocky on Apr 08, 2014 11:32 AM
even if a person wins by walk-over, he still get the winner prize money and the points for that match.... its still a victory but by walk-over... so thats how I won my second bet...hope I'm clear to your dumbHead
Fede continues to defy age. He will remain the greatest for a long time, should he play like Agassi till 35 yrs age or even do a Connors and play until 40.
Re: Roger is the greatest !!!
by anurag rathor on Apr 08, 2014 10:30 AM
He isn't defying age. Because he is surely playing for late age but he isn't winning anything of note.
Re: @ Anuraug rathor (nadal fan)
by anurag rathor on Apr 07, 2014 03:28 PM
The problem is that you consider different ids as different people. So your own fake ids like 'Guest and anuraug rathor'clarifying the bet and supporting you is not a big deal. Let any neutral person opine on this issue I have no issues with that.But not your own fake ids.One person posting under different ids does not constitute multiple people like you are suggesting to justify your loss.
Re: Re: @ Anuraug rathor (nadal fan)
by rocky on Apr 07, 2014 03:57 PM
I can't be more clear on my stand... take it or leave it. but I'm not going to quit. For a long time I had quit as rocky and posting as 'x'.... honoring my bet, then later I won another bet to win back my lost id.
in my first bet, I had only meant rocky will not be coming to the forum... only my id was at stake in that bet.... accept it... I played it safe and so out-smarted you...
you are a loser to still be posting in numerous clone ids
Re: Re: Re: Re: @ Anuraug rathor (nadal fan)
by rocky on Apr 07, 2014 04:35 PM
I accepted that I had lost my first bet... which is accepting the defeat.... I can't be more gracious in accepting the defeat... thats why I quit as rocky and started blogging a 'x'...
what do you mean by I didn't win my second bet...? I won it when I said djoko will beat nishikori... and djoko got a walk-over and so I won it
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ Anuraug rathor (nadal fan)
by anurag rathor on Apr 08, 2014 10:34 AM
A walkover is a walkover. It is not a win. So your bet is null and void without a win or loss.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ Anuraug rathor (nadal fan)
by rocky on Apr 08, 2014 11:41 AM
A walk-over is not considered for h2h... but its still a match won by walk-over... the match is valid and is counted for points and prize money.. I can't control my laughter looking at your dumbness
