Stakhovsky has got it wrong. He may have to beat Federer and his legend but never his ego. Federer is one person who has the least amount of ego in the men's field. Federer is a very down to earth person and has never been egoistic.
Re: Most down to earth star
by Sweta on Jun 27, 2013 07:28 PM
The word ego has been so one-sidedly used in India, that you fail to appreciate what Stakhovsky (and the author of this article) meant by Federer's ego. Stop being a Federer chauvinist and appreciate young talent, who believe in themselves. That is good for the great game of tennis.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Most down to earth star
by DIGAMBAR JOSHI on Jun 27, 2013 09:02 PM
The reporter has ego. He is very glad personally because he dreamnt of having beaten the Federer. Legends have no ego. Federer ruled the Wimbledon since 2003, but u foolish reporter will not report wimbledon next year.
Re: Most down to earth star
by Sastry AR on Jun 27, 2013 08:36 PM
RF WAS ALWAYS HUMBLE AND NEVER EGOISTIC. DEFEATS WILL NOT DEFEAT HIS SKILLS AND IT WILL ONLY MAKE HIM COME BACK STRONGER; A R SASSTRY-09490117381
Re: Re: Most down to earth star
by Anuraug Rathor on Jun 28, 2013 11:10 AM
Sastry...why have you given out your mobile number?Are you expecting anyone to call you and congratulate you on your post?FYI,your post wasn't that special so you can suffice with this reply.Have a good day.
