Saina IS CLEARLY THE VICTIM of Bad Call and actually winner of the match. Loss due to Bad Call is Part of game and we have to accept it gracefully. BUT WHY and HOW did Saina allowed her opponent to win 2nd game and Five consecutive points at the end ?? Her opponent was new comer and "mino" in front of saina. Saina had to pay for taking her opponent lightly.
Re: Re: saina mirza???????????
by manoj warrier on Apr 26, 2013 10:11 AM
It is not the first name that he is talking about. Instead, its MIRZA what needs to be corrected. The badminton player's name is SAINA NEHWAL and not SAINA MIRZA. Dyslexic? Yay!
Saina missed a greagt chance of winning the Indian open, an event she has not yet won. With all 3 top ranking Chinese players skipping the event, Saina was expected to win,but unfortunately, Hashimoto laid low her chances.Agreed Saina was upset due to a bad line call, but losing 5 straight points is too much for a player of her standings . Infact Saina should not have lost the 2nd game, Hashimoto is ranked 42 in the world, i.e 40 places below Saina.thus there are no excuses for Saina's loss.
A player of international level cannot get upset for a faulty line call since such things are part of the game.Actually the Japanese was in better form let us accept that. also we should not expect Saina to win all the tournaments she plays. This puts undue pressure on the player.
