Re: Withou Nadal, anything won
by Mathur Ramachandran on Sep 11, 2012 01:28 PM
WHAT A YEAR 2012 IS TURNING OUT TO BE AUSTRALIAN OPEN - DJOKOVIC FRENCH OPEN - RAFA NADAL WIMBLEDON - ROGER FEDERER US OPEN - ANDY MURRAY
Re: Re: Withou Nadal, anything won
by bandla srinivas on Sep 11, 2012 09:46 AM
Gentleman-Your view shows that you have a poor understanding of the game of Tennis. Your obsession with Nadal should not belittle the victory of other Grand slam winners. Please do some more analysis of this great game before going public. Regards and Best wishes.
Re: Re: Withou Nadal, anything won
by raja garaga on Sep 11, 2012 10:36 AM
if nadal loses in second round of wimbeldon or skip us open with injury what is the winners fault. as per ur opinion from 2005 onwards to this date nadal should be winning all 4 grand slams every taking his count to 7yrsX4= 28 gs titles. he did not win all these players fedex, novak have won the titles when nadal was there.
Re: ...
by bingo lingo on Sep 11, 2012 08:59 AM
u r one of the most sincere follower of sports :-) .....have become a fan of u since ur regular updates on 2010 asian games...
2012 saw 4 different major title holders. I leave it for historians to find out when such an event occurred last. Next Slam winner in my opinion is going to be Tomas Berdych.
Re: Well done, Andy
by bingo lingo on Sep 11, 2012 09:00 AM
hope so .....but these days , hardly any young guy winning the slam....hopefully Raonic can make it to the QF's of Aus open...
Re: Well done, Andy
by rocky on Sep 11, 2012 09:02 AM
i'm happy whoever wins the slams.. except nadal. now there are more than one person to stop nadal from winning anymore GS titles.
We had four different winners this years the slams .This is perhaps a very good sign .Pity Nadal is not there . Now Murray has won a slam and Olympics it is time he wins more . What a wait for Britishers - who gave a far decent administration ,law and order and justice to our country
Re: PERHAPS THE BEST NEWS
by mohammad zeeshan on Sep 11, 2012 08:26 AM
Which brings me to the question," Has the British Raj did more good than bad to India"?
Re: US OPEN WINNER
by simon seth on Sep 11, 2012 07:32 AM
why retire? He has found his rhythm and would go on to clinch more slam victories.Moreover, he is proving to be a real nemesis for Novak whom he has been beating more often. May be its time for Novak to retire.
Re: Re: US OPEN WINNER
by bingo lingo on Sep 11, 2012 08:03 AM
i think u r very poor in understanding ..... what he meant to say was that if Andy had retired without winning a Slam , it would have been painful for him....now if he retires at this moment , still he can feel proud for his achievement as the GS title not elusive for him anymore...but he did not mean that Andy will retire now coz he won the win US open :-)
