Google-'did new york times out roger federer' for the stunning truth.I have always enlightened the people here with my knowledge and now I bring more prooF
Novak is better than Nadal,that's why he is no.1 says tennis' pundit Mithani.So by that argument,Nadal must be better than Federer,as he;s ranked above him!Or are the rules different here?And lets hear about teh 'surface change' at Wimbledon which gave Nadal 2 titles.Must be some top secret info only the pundits have access to.
Re: More Mithani Gems
by HUSSAIN MITHANI on May 23, 2012 11:32 AM
welcome back anurag. how many more multiple id's you are going to use? cheers to another frustrated nadal fan.
Re: Re: More Mithani Gems
by kieran dsouza on May 23, 2012 01:08 PM
why should we be frustrated when he has just beaten Novak black and blue in Rome Masters
Re: Re: More Mithani Gems
by varadaraj pai on May 24, 2012 12:03 AM
Frustrated?Well,you would know about frustration Mithani....you're having to run scared from answering my challenges,coward.Now what about the 'surface change' at Wimbledon....found any Federer fan blog that proves it??
Re: Re: Re: More Mithani Gems
by varadaraj pai on May 24, 2012 01:55 PM
Mithani....you are seeing multiple me's??DO I appear inyour dreams as well?Well it is a medical condition.You need to seek medical help.
Fed fans here are clutching on to straws to save their sinking boat.Their arguments are specious at best.Conveniently Federer is 'past his prime'(which they wont define),but Nadal being 5 years his junior is not factored in when comparing.The fact that he lags Nadal in Masters titles,couldnt beat him in so many attempts at RG(he's supposed to be all court player,the GOAT,remember?) etc is not factored in.Now blue clay is the new flavour of the season.I admit Nadal can never beat Federers record of being the first and last to win a title on blue clay.Nadal's Wimbledon success is due to 'surface change" HAHAHAHAHA.Can anyone bring us some evidence about this 'surface change'?Was it done only in 2008 and 2010,only when Nadal plays,or only on Nadal's side of the court?Your opinions are not enough,please bring us some official evidence.And tell us why the 'all court player' who can win anywhere couldnt adapt to the so called 'surface change' like he did to blue clay.
Re: Federer
by Bango Tamgo on May 24, 2012 02:07 PM
Yes there was surface change at Wimbledon to favor Nadal.I have proof at a FEDE fan blog.President of AELTA is my friend,I have plaYED club level tennis for 10 years till I retired with tendinitis so I know all.
Re: y nadal fans mark my post as abusive/irrelevant ??
by Sweta on May 22, 2012 09:32 PM
I have answered all your questions... still you keep thinking that nobody has answered ur questions.. wake up dude..
Re: Re: y nadal fans mark my post as abusive/irrelevant ??
by bango tango on May 23, 2012 06:36 PM
hahahaaaaaaa....wt a lier u r !!! u ve not answered a single ques....
fine , tell me , how nadal has got huge biceps ???? he himself have admitted that he has never hit the gym :-)
