Re: Number 16
by Chaitanya NS on Jul 22, 2012 06:54 PM
interesting.. bug stats manipulated based on how u want to see. Did Nadal win Davis Cup alone for Spain ? Nadal turned pro in 2001, why u say 2004-2012 ?
Re: Re: Re: Number 16
by Chaitanya NS on Jul 22, 2012 09:02 PM
who stopped Nadal from appearing in GS until 2004 ? Was he scared to enter GS Or not qualified until 2004 ? Fed losing first round until 2003.. wow , but Nadal is losing in 2nd round even now.. However, you are WRONG again, Nadal played in 2003 Wimbledon. Stop generating stats to benefit what you want to see.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Number 16
by breddy last on Jul 22, 2012 10:53 PM
Yes nadal played winbledon and US open in 2003. But doesn't make much diff. to his outstanding stats....
What is your problem if nadal didn't played GS until 2004. Its his wish... silly fellow!!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Number 16
by Chaitanya NS on Jul 22, 2012 11:12 PM
Question is not about I have any problem or not., its about stats considered only to favour nadal. You can see Fed's carreer is made 14 yrs & Nadal just 8yrs, which is NOT true. No doubt Nadal have outstanding stats & king of clay, but Fed have better stats than him everywhere except on clay. got it breddy fellow ?