Re: why is rafa still childless
by Another Critic on Jun 21, 2011 02:35 PM
Yes, and Federer hears to those shouts and thinks he's allowed to daal and he daals hard; here comes the two twins.
Indian participation at Wimbledon is just for name sake( In Singles),then WHY should Nadal, Williams and Djokovic hit Indian Media Head Lines ?? I am sure French, Spanish and American Media will never give Head Line status for Indian Sports Stars Like Sachin MSD, Mirza etc. Wimbledon may be important tournament BUT with No indian participation, It should NOT be Head Line on Front page just like spain and US Does not know about SRT and MSD
Re: Why Should this be .........................
by prashant sharma on Jun 21, 2011 03:50 PM
u mean to say that any sport, activity, event which india is not good at should not be in media? what kind of a person are u? the world is a global village. the boundaries of nationality are fast dissapearing. Tennis is the 2nd most popular global sport after soccer and is enjoyed by many people in india. this is regardless of whether we have indians winning in singles or not. as far is cricket is concerned, it is played by onloy 8 countries. out of those 4 are limited to the subcontinent. hence the rest of the world is unaware. also cricket cannot be called a sport. it requires no atheleticism, is completely taken over by bookies and every match is fixed.
Re: Re: Why Should this be .........................
by surya das on Jun 21, 2011 08:44 PM
Mr. P Sharma, I liked few lines of urs,then as usual u add masala into it. Who said Tennis is 2nd most popular sports? It is not matter how many countries playing rather how may people are following.
Go Wiki or BBC it's cricket the 2nd most popular sports followed by Rugby.
And, abt how many countries playing Cricket? For ur information West Indies consists of 15 independent counries(they play separate in other sports)but play as one country. Cricket WC followed nearly 2bil people, its not me, published by BBC. And abt fixing, every sports has, surf net you will get the details.
In India sports are not legalised bet or else we could ve avoided this. But one or 2 players involvement can't point towards the game. So, dont talk rubbish abt cricket. Play oneday, then will find whether u need atheletism or not. when u write this r u thinking abt fielding capability of MunafPatel or AsishNehera?
Good luck next time. Same time I love tennis, it is my 2nd most fav sports.
Re: Re: Why Should this be .........................
by surya das on Jun 21, 2011 08:43 PM
Mr. P Sharma, I liked few lines of urs,then as usual u add masala into it. Who said Tennis is 2nd most popular sports? It is not matter how many countries playing rather how may people are following.
Go Wiki or BBC it's cricket the 2nd most popular sports followed by Rugby.
And, abt how many countries playing Cricket? For ur information West Indies consists of 15 independent counries(they play separate in other sports)but play as one country. Cricket WC followed nearly 2bil people, its not me, published by BBC. And abt fixing, every sports has, surf net you will get the details.
In India sports are not legalised bet or else we could ve avoided this. But one or 2 players involvement can't point towards the game. So, dont talk rubbish abt cricket. Play oneday, then will find whether u need atheletism or not. when u write this r u thinking abt fielding capability of MunafPatel or AsishNehera?
Good luck next time. Same time I love tennis, it is my 2nd most fav sports.
Re: Why Should this be .........................
by yumraj on Jun 21, 2011 07:18 PM
You mean to say that Indian should only stick with this Currupt and money oriented business (sorry! game) like Cricket.
