In all probability Nadal may win in straight sets. The kind of determination being showed by him at this stage is phenomenal. However if Djokovic does win this match, it would be a superb achievement and it can be said that he has finally arrived in the top league
Re: Sampras
by srikanth donthu on Sep 13, 2010 09:00 AM
yes i agree with u. federer has only 1 strong opponent in the form of nadal,but sampras had 3 or 4 strong opponents at that time
Re: Re: Sampras
by Ashok Kumar on Sep 13, 2010 09:41 AM
That is not Federer's Fault, right? He may be struggling now, but if you recall back the rediculous easiness with which Fedex used to win his matches, you would agree that this man has indeed been a champion and deserves credit for giving attacking tennis a new dimension without himself looking imposing in physique.
He was exhasted after his win vs federer. He gets one more day of rest. lucky guy. even Nadal is lucky to get to the final without even playing a top five player. Nadal vs djokovic should be a good match. I predict Djokovic to win in four sets.
Re: its good for Djokovic
by S Shrikanth on Sep 13, 2010 08:34 AM
The odds are against Djokovic, The winner of first SF generally wins US Open final, and current form of Nadal is devastating.
But who knows that Monday belongs to whom? But I am putting my money on Nadal.
Re: its good for Djokovic
by dps dps on Sep 13, 2010 08:05 AM
Nadal is too strong both physically and mentally to be beaten. I think it will be Nadal in 4 sets
Re: its good for Djokovic
by sanjay bhargav behere on Sep 13, 2010 08:08 AM
It;s not Nadal's fault that Murry lost earlier. Otherwise it would have been great semifnal between them just like Fed. & Djok.Yesterday
