nadal will win more than 25 slams and will win career GS's many times and defeat many players including Federer thumpingly UNLESS UNTIL ATP STRONGLY GOES FOR DRUG TEST LIKE WHAT ATHLETICS DOES...
These following points make me strongly believe that nadal is taking drugs thru PRP therapy...
1. How come some1 improve his serve drastically within 2 weeks ????? (Cincinnati to US open gap is 2 weeks) ....HE HIMSELF ADMITTED THAT HE HAS NOT HIT THE GYM !!!!!! it was just due to the change of grips !!!!!I don't understand y tennnis legends like Agassi, Wilander, lendl etc who did'nt have great serves , didn't know of this grip change technique !!!! How even current players like Youzhny, cilic , simon etc. dont know of this technique with so much improvement of racquet technology !!!!
The truth is it takes much much more time to improve serve speed , at least a year though I havent seen any player improve his serve in later part of his career apart from nadal, davydenko .... BUT neither davydenko's serve has changed so drastically nor that happened in 2 weeks ... Read this comment in an article :
What is the "magic" grip that Nadal is now using? As far as I am aware there are really only two grips that can be used for effective serving - the Continental backhand (which most top players use), and the Continental/Eastern variation (to get more spin, as you can't really serve flat with a full Eastern grip).
Re: At Last, I Admit that ...
by bango tango on Sep 10, 2010 11:48 AM
That doesn't leave much of a choice - and it certainly isn't tennis rocket science. I'll bet any grip change Nadal has made will be scarcely different from what he has always used - one or other of those variants. Huge increases in power certainly don't come from something as isolated as a minor grip change - it is not as if the guy was previously serving with a Western forehand grip! Power comes down to a whole lot of quite complex features - which is why it isn't easy to get or increase. Unless you are Nadal.
2. WHY DIDN'T HE DO THAT IN EARLIER US OPENS WHEN HE HAD KNEW THAT SERVICE IS A BIGGEST WEAPON ON DECO TURF..
3.From an article : There is the disparity of the two arms in nadal in this US open While you expect a tennis player who doesn't do any significant weight training to have a bigger bicep on the racquet side, the exaggerated looking disparity seen in the few pictures (can't attach those). His right bicep looks almost atrophied in comparison to the pump of the left bicep. The left bicep also seems 2 fluctuate in size by the hour. I've never seen anything like that. Bodybuilders who spend a lot of time in the gym will come out with a "pump" after a workout, where the muscles are a bit more pumped up (which is why they workout right before a competition). Nadal seems to be getting a massive "pump" by swinging a tennis racquet, that then fades after a few hours.
Re: Re: At Last, I Admit that ...
by bango tango on Sep 10, 2010 11:49 AM
Clearly, a tennis player cannot swing a racquet to that extent, or he would not be
able to lift his racquet after a few games. As I see it, the best explanation for Nadal's fluctuating bicep pump is the use of steroids combined with a lack
of weight training, where the steroids allow the player to pump up, simulating curls, but with less than full failure needed.
4. Here are the comments given by nadal few months back :
I hate the gym. I don’t spend much time in there and I never have done – I just don’t see why. I only ever run when there’s some point to it – say, if it’s
in a game of tennis. I do a lot of aerobics in the pre-season period, but after that I keep fit by playing in tournaments." - Rafael Nadal - negating months of arguments from his supporters that his muscles were from hard work in the gym
"If I lose tomorrow, I'll go back to Mallorca and who will know where I am if I have no access to the Internet? Now, if they knock at my door in Mallorca,
they're going to give me a warning. It's happened to Carlos [Moya] before. They sent him a warning and this is most unfair," he said. - An angry Rafael Nadal, explaining how he planned to miss his next out of competition drug test (which he missed the following month).
THERE ARE MANY MANY THINGS WHICH POINT THAT nadal IS A DRUG CHEATER ....... search tennishasasteroidproblem
Re: Re: Re: Re: At Last, I Admit that ...
by bango tango on Sep 10, 2010 11:54 AM
has any1 seen the physique of nadal at the age of 18 in reverse ....how come his physique changed drastically within a year ??? was he practicing tennis or hitting the gym for hours n hours ???
Re: At Last, I Admit that ...
by kareem on Sep 10, 2010 02:20 PM
yeah could be..I have this doubt long back(not only after this Service)..but he cannot go so long, with in 2-3 years max..then he will be vanished..
Contd. from above. Then there is his mannerism, which includes so many ritualistic gestures like tugging his pants, and using the towel before and after every serve, which helps him stay calm, but drives his opponents already on the edge, nuts. And finally, the way he handles media: He may have learnt it from Federer, but he has topped him there. He never has accepted that he is a better player than Federer, though he knows very well that he has a hold over the Swiss, and Federer is not going to beat him now, but he allows Federer to explain why he is still the best despite losing so frequently to Nadal. By this tactic, he lets Federer absorb all the pressure, while he himself remains aloof. Poor Federer! He can perhaps match Nadal technically, particularly on the faster surfaces, but he cannot match him tactically. The results are fre everyone to see, except of course experts like Anurag Rathore, V Vasudevan and bango tango.
Rediff is most probably not going to post the news of Nadal's victory over Verdasco, even after he has won the tournament. I have been therefore compelled to comment on that match here. Watching the match, I could not help feeling sorry for all his opponents including Federer. There is not much to choose between any two players in the Top 20, so far as the technical aspects of the game are concerned; all of them have all the shots, but when it comes to strategising and pressurizing, Nadal has no peers. Most of them take the court against him with no particular plan in mind. Nadal however has a plan for every match. The RG final of 2008 comes to the mind, when Nadal kept feeding Federer shoulder high balls on the backhand. It is very important for the players to have two or three strategies against Nadal, and try all of them one after the other. It is not easy because Nadal hardly has any weaknesses, but the players can at least try not to play to his strength. For example, if Nadal is fed with a short ball landing behind his service line, Nadal is sure to hit it in a corner where the player cannot reach. It is better to play a high lob instead, which Nadal will probably murder 9 times out of 10, but there will be that 10th opportunity. The way he exults after scoring a point is another part of his strategy to terrorise the opponent into submission. The players would do well by not looking at him. Contd.
Re: aishwarya patil
by aishwarya patil on Sep 10, 2010 10:13 AM
Contd. from above. Then there is his mannerism, which includes so many ritualistic gestures like tugging his pants, and using the towel before and after every serve, which helps him stay calm, but drives his opponents already on the edge, nuts. And finally, the way he handles media: He may have learnt it from Federer, but he has topped him there. He never has accepted that he is a better player than Federer, though he knows very well that he has a hold over the Swiss, and Federer is not going to beat him now, but he allows Federer to explain why he is still the best despite losing so frequently to Nadal. By this tactic, he lets Federer absorb all the pressure, while he himself remains aloof. Poor Federer! He can perhaps match Nadal technically, particularly on the faster surfaces, but he cannot match him tactically. The results are fre everyone to see, except of course experts like Anurag Rathore, V Vasudevan and bango tango.
Re: aishwarya patil
by kareem on Sep 10, 2010 02:18 PM
Federer vs Nadal final??if so Federer wil win in staright set, Nadal may be too sexy, but have to learn little more in fast surface.. Please don't hide after Final
Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by aishwarya patil on Sep 10, 2010 05:26 PM
Of course you are an oldie. The word 'Sexy' does not necessarily mean sexually stimulating only. It also means hungry, and is not obscene, except in Islam. Nadal in 2008 was hungry, and seemed sexy. He is again looking sexy. We shall of course discuss after the final. At least you agree that he is not just a Clay Court Expert. I see you have a good memory. I also remember you doubted my credentials about writing on Tennis, for I knew precious little about the game. I wonder if you still think the same.
Re: Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by kareem on Sep 10, 2010 06:36 PM
Sexy = hungry..good ,keep it up. anyway I am not blaming you..I told that time, he would get injury very soon, that happened, roger came back,he will regain his first rank very soon once more..Nadal will be vanished with knee injury(his playing style like that)
Re: Re: Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by aishwarya patil on Sep 11, 2010 06:43 AM
Uncle Kareem. I would like you to refer to a site like thefreedictionarydotcom, and look for various meanings of the world 'sexy'. This particular site gives, in addition to the meanings you have in that dirty mind of yours, the following meanings: Interesting, Exciting or Trendy. This much for one word, which offended you so much that you have remembered it for two years. Now about future. You are giving your predictions as if you were a Nazoomee. I do not lay any claims to predictive astrology, and I cannot say when a particular player is going to be injured. I like to play and watch Tennis, and I like Nadal. I also like Federer, but I like Nadal more. If, in any dictionary, this means that I do not know anything about Tennis, please refer that dictionary to me. Have a nice day.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by kareem on Sep 11, 2010 08:59 PM
grandma U told I love Nadal he is so sexy , u meant he was so hungry??not blaming u, below average brain, that is waht u got..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by aishwarya patil on Sep 12, 2010 07:30 AM
Happy Eid Chacha Kareem. Surely you think you are a superbrain. I am not surprised. All fools think like this. By the way, are you aware of the result of the Federer-Djokovic match? Or you are still busy calculating when Nadal is going to get injured again? Federer despite his elegance was carrying injuries at Paris and Wimbledon. Did your Nazoom foresee that?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by kareem on Sep 12, 2010 10:40 AM
yeah, I told before, that is real final, djokovic won, but final I don't think nadal will get any set (if djokovic very tired Nadal can do something)..I love federer because of his sexy shots, U like Nodal because he is sexy that is the difference.
