Discussion Board View article

Total 13 messages Pages | 1
Sudden Lee
Murray-Gasquet
by Sudden Lee on May 25, 2010 08:01 AM  | Hide replies

Such a good match and not one quip on it by Rediff bloggers...just goes to show that there are hardly any tennis fans here (and those who are there, with their limited knowledge, expect Somdev to win the French)!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
suppandi
Re: Murray-Gasquet
by suppandi on May 25, 2010 12:13 PM
u r tennis - knowall?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
x
Re: Re: Murray-Gasquet
by x on May 25, 2010 02:18 PM
There is more to tennis than just nadal, federer.. get out of cricket and try to know something about other sports also.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sudden Lee
Re: Re: Murray-Gasquet
by Sudden Lee on May 25, 2010 01:52 PM
one does not need to be a know all but with even decent knowledge of the game, u shud know that its more than just than Fed-Nadal!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ajay
Re: Murray-Gasquet
by Ajay on May 25, 2010 09:27 AM
dude.... take a pill & get a life....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
x
Re: Re: Murray-Gasquet
by x on May 25, 2010 02:19 PM
what kind of a pill is that. 'take a pill and get a life..'

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Michael
Re: Murray-Gasquet
by Michael on May 25, 2010 09:40 AM
Gasquet is an unseeded player and he was just riding his luck for quite sometime against murray. Andy is a much better player and thats what happens in grandslams, its tougher to beat a better player.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vital statistix
Re: Re: Murray-Gasquet
by vital statistix on May 25, 2010 01:46 PM
Gasquet may be unseeded but that has nothing to do with his Tennis-playing abilities..he was off-court for almost a year and that's why the drop in rankings ! And puerly on artistic terms, he was far better than Murray yesterday..who was actually lucky he managed to take a set and see off a tiring Gasquet (who had just come back from winning the tourney in Nice)..



   Forward   |   Report abuse
x
Re: Re: Re: Murray-Gasquet
by x on May 25, 2010 02:13 PM
Agreed he is a very talented player. His backhand shots were brilliant, just he couldn't pull it off in the third set.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sudden Lee
Re: Re: Murray-Gasquet
by Sudden Lee on May 25, 2010 01:55 PM
Unseeded? Anyone wud be unseeded if he wasn't playing at all the last twelve months. Riding his luck? Did u even see the macth? As far as shot making talent is concerned, Gasquet is far superior to Murray, who is probably the best counter-puncher in tennis. Gasquet's backhand is the most lethal after Kuerten and Safin.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
x
Re: Re: Re: Murray-Gasquet
by x on May 25, 2010 02:21 PM
you seem to have forgotten roger backhand, which is more consistent and has variety

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sudden Lee
Re: Re: Re: Re: Murray-Gasquet
by Sudden Lee on May 25, 2010 03:57 PM
Roger's backhand is his weakness...he play it perfectly on grass, which requres the chips and the dinks more but chk him when he has to contend with Nadal's overspin and has to take the ball from above his shoulders...he struggles! Thats also bcos he switched from a double hander to a single hander and as such, is not as natural a single hander as say Gasquet or Wawrinka are.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
True Indian
Federer is the best
by True Indian on May 25, 2010 07:07 AM

East or west Federer is the best....

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 13 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message