whether India has participated without proctice which is required at International level or corruption has done two jobs 1) the comforts sanctioned to the players were not awarded to the players and the money distributed among the officers 2) less competetent players were selected due to corruption. learn from European countries who don't compromise with their country's interest, Swami Vivekananda told once that we have to learn working culture from West but we are learning fashion culture from them, how shameful for our leaders.
FINALLY WE CUD EQUALISE WITH SOUTH AFRICA GIVING US A CHANCE TO BE No 7 OR 8. GOOD IMPROVEMENT BUT WE CUD HAVE DONE BETTER. WE FAIL AT THE CORRECT TIME. FORGET ALL-- WE SCREWED PAKISTAN WHO ARE NOW AT THE BOTTOM OF THE POOL. INDIAN HOCKEY WILL FURTHER IMPROVE. RAVI MEHROTRA
go india go you are the best beat austrila ass chakda india gogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogogoo yes i love my india
Re: dhaliwal
by Venugopalan on Mar 09, 2010 05:31 PM
India could have won the game against sa, but for the disputed goal. South Africans did not protest immediately after the foul but protested after a goal was scorred. very unfair of the umpire to disallow the goal..european umpires, what can you expect..?
