Re: Screw FIFA world cup India has the most beatufil woman in the
by JAGADISH TA on Jun 30, 2010 10:59 AM
U Sameer, u sound like.. sorry ur an insane. Wherever any article is on Football... Ur posting the same comments wherever I've come across....
Re: Screw FIFA world cup India has the most beatufil woman in the
by Talisman on Jun 30, 2010 10:27 AM
What did Fifa do to deserve this? Indian sports bodies are run by politicians that are fat and cannot move. Now, we all know how much they can help the sports?
Fifa is not running a clumsy an shadowy organization like BCCI that makes use of the name of India and allows fat politicians to lineup their pockets.
It is a legitimate sports organization that has some policies.
Guys ,dont reply to this guy since they are p*imps for rediff.rediff encourages these guys to post the same ssssshi*t again and again and waste our time for nothing.
Re: @ mohammed haris
by addu khan on Jun 30, 2010 09:03 AM
other names of the moderator- true indian,sameer bhagatetc.Rediff just wants to waste our time and make money.Reply only to serious guys.
Re: Unfair to the refrees
by True Indian on Jun 30, 2010 10:51 AM
But it should not happen in the manner as it happened in Hockey. The counter attack of India in one of the matches was ruled out as it was sent to referral...
England = India France = Pakistan Spain = South Africa Argentina = Australia of today Brazil = Australia of 90s Germany = Australia of today Portugal = England of Ashes 2005 Holland = Sri Lanka Italy = New Zealand Uruguay = Less than England, more than New Zealand
Re: .
by wizardo id on Jun 30, 2010 07:29 AM
why compare to cricket ? there's no precedence of cricket in football. because one goal can change the complexion of the game by either teams.
Re: Re: .
by Murali Ramakrishnan on Jun 30, 2010 07:39 AM
exactly. Why to compare Cricket. Infact England had it been given the goal, I am sure England would not have attacked all out leaving the Goalie alone. That paved the way for Germany to counter attack with little ease.
Poor England. But though they have not been playing well, which Germany was equally bad in the league matches. I pity for Mexico, unfortunately they met up with Arg in the round 16.. Really good team. Japan also played superb. Cheers, Murali
Re: Re: Re: .
by True Indian on Jun 30, 2010 10:53 AM
Yes that decision was devastating. It changed the entire equation... but at the same time the England defenders were pathetic. The John Terry, one of the world's most respected defender was clueless of what he was doing. Infact the first goal was his mistake.
Why do these technophobes think the human element is out with the introduction of video analysis. Have the infrared cameras and video replays taken out the human element in tennis or cricket?
In fact, more people have started walking in cricket (after being out) than ever because they know they would be caught on the big screen lying.
FIFA is hypocritical when it says it does not want to rely on video cameras for any decision-making. Have they forgotten that the referee had NOT EVEN SEEN the Zidane headbutt against Matterazzi in last 2006, until the video cameras finally showed the replays.
It was only then that the referee decided to red card Zidane. So, the video-based decision-making is already there along with the human element.
Re: .
by BALACHANDRAN PARANGODATH on Jun 30, 2010 08:00 AM
It is a must. FIFA should introduce the goal-line technology at the earliest. It will not ruin the game. After all only two or three minutes are to be spared for reference. The human error spoiled a classic contest(UK X Germany)The decision not to retain those referees is fine. Let them officiate in Kerala's Sevens Football tournaments which may give them some RICH AND HOT RETURNS!
Re: Re: .
by True Indian on Jun 30, 2010 10:56 AM
Its easy to introduce the stuff in cricket as there is a gap in between the balls where as in football the game is always on. So it could be tricky to introduce the video and stuff in football, spl. with the possiblity of counter attacks in picture at each attack.
Re: Re: Re: .
by Mohammad Haris on Jun 30, 2010 09:36 PM
Arent there stoppages every time somebody commits a foul or handball or if there is an altercation between players, or if there is confusion in who kicked whom, or who threw the ball out?
Stoppages happen every other minute in football. The time is added after the mandated 909 minutes of play, so there is no problem in introducing video-based decision-making at all.
Majority of FIFA agrees, but implementing changes take years. Surely, it will be implemented.
