Re: Screw FIFA world cup India has the most beatufil woman in the
by Onie on Jun 30, 2010 04:25 PM
Hats off man! It must be quite difficult to combine insularity, stupidity, an inferiority complex, racism and hero worship into a single post yet look how well you have done it!
Why do these technophobes think the human element is out with the introduction of video analysis. Have the infrared cameras and video replays taken out the human element in tennis or cricket?
In fact, more people have started walking in cricket (after being out) than ever because they know they would be caught on the big screen lying.
FIFA is hypocritical when it says it does not want to rely on video cameras for any decision-making. Have they forgotten that the referee had NOT EVEN SEEN the Zidane headbutt against Matterazzi in last 2006, until the video cameras finally showed the replays.
It was only then that the referee decided to red card Zidane. So, the video-based decision-making is already there along with the human element.
England = India France = Pakistan Spain = South Africa Argentina = Australia of today Brazil = Australia of 90s Germany = Australia of today Portugal = England of Ashes 2005 Holland = Sri Lanka Italy = New Zealand Uruguay = Less than England more than New Zealand
Re: RETURNING TO MONKEY AGE
by Ajit Birdi on Jun 30, 2010 12:26 AM
And they have called upon a monkey called jayapriyan to make the balls out of stone.
now england is out, what can u do to their die hard fans? FIFA shud pay money for england fans for playing with their emotions.and wasting thier time in supporting. atlest for those who hav gone to watch the match live.
Referees are there for Offside on either sides. Why Most Watchable Event do not have Goal Line or TV Referee? FIFA officials, Please watch Cricket matches?
Re: Why Most Watchable Event do not have Goal Line or TV Referee?
by Bala on Jun 30, 2010 04:17 AM
Unlike cricket, Football is a free flowing game. You cannot see much ads also during a football game. You cannot have a referral system for everything but certainly can have for goal line.
Re: REFEREE'S DECISION WAS RIGHT
by Jay on Jun 29, 2010 07:23 PM
You are wrong - technically it is a goal and it was disallowed. Anyway England would have lost to Germany, that is a different story.
Re: REFEREE'S DECISION WAS RIGHT
by nelson john on Jun 29, 2010 09:24 PM
I think you are the only idiot in the world who says that was not a goal. Please stop posting such irresponsible statements. Grow up man.
Re: REFEREE'S DECISION WAS RIGHT
by anthony gonsalves on Jun 29, 2010 06:42 PM
stop writing your technical crap.......enjoy the game,there has to be a winner fair n square.
Re: REFEREE'S DECISION WAS RIGHT
by CommentGiver on Jun 29, 2010 07:20 PM
damodar you made that rule ??? the ball whether moving or dead ,once it crosses the line it is a goal
Re: REFEREE'S DECISION WAS RIGHT
by Salil on Jun 29, 2010 07:39 PM
first of all... there are more fast paced game than soccer that use television referral system. If you are following ice hockey, soccer would seem dull (in terms of pace off course)
Re: Re: REFEREE'S DECISION WAS RIGHT
by surya das on Jun 29, 2010 07:42 PM
How do u find Tennis is a less fast space game compare to Soccer? Dude, watch an international tennis match then u realize. Tennis played between any top players in world rankings is 10 times faster than these shoot ball. And, basketball or icehockey, u should not include.. these two sports are 100 times faster than football. so, don't bark with ur stupid tech idea.
