Can someone define the character of the so called Mr. Ram Jethmalani who was counsel for many terrorists and even tried to save Jessica Lal killer Manu Sharma.
On one side his office fought case against brutal kieelr in uniform Sumedh Singh saini, IPS of Punjab and on other side he is fighting case for same sumedh singh saini in supreme court to fulfil political obligation as he is MP for BJP and BJP is in alliance with Akali's in Punjab.
So in his views, Modi is not accused. Yes, it can be for Mr. Jethmalani.
Re: Ram Jethmalani
by Jabali a on Dec 26, 2010 05:57 AM
It is not just Ram Jethmalani, every criminal lawyer's character defending a known criminal would be questionable in your logic. It is difference between ethics and personal morality. Legal ethics must override personal morals for the greater good of upholding a justice system in which the accused are given a fair trial and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
yes, we can wait and wait indefinitely. After 10th Jan, then there will be something else in which RJM will argue and get another stay. Excellent. Trust the sitting judge is not transferred by then.
Modi made millions... his relatives and friends made millions... those who cannot get the loot... not public money... got agitated... he made IPL money minting event.. authentic or unauthentic.. he rolled in fresh money.. his downfall started from Tharoor.. But what about the millions he shared with Pawar et .. all.. not accounted for?????
Re: Bull ..hit
by spring on Dec 25, 2010 03:53 PM
moreover bjp leader Ram Jethmalani want to defend case against him. same with chhattisgarh bjp state government want to protect naxalitte mob.
Re: Re: Bull ..hit
by TD on Dec 28, 2010 01:50 AM
Two most progressive states of the country Gujarat for Growth and Bihar for coming up or back from down under are both in NDA state govt rules...cong only gives inflation and corruption, extortion and openly propogate that we are govt for the minorities...so who will take care of the majority of this country's people...atleast not congress...shame on people who vote for such a party...!
Re: crap judiciary
by fulltoo dhamal on Dec 25, 2010 04:03 PM
oh no.... pls stay away of commenting anything . Be wise, don't expose ur non-sence brain here...
BCCI ignored the fact that the word used is ANNUAL General Body and not General Body or Special General Body. Hence there is point in the contention of the Advocate of Mr Modi that the resolution passed in the Special General Body Meeting is invalid. I think the only solution is to wait till the next Annual General Body Meeting