Nadal will be back, ....talk all you want. He's a player who has consistently beaten Roger federer... Just because davydenko played extreamly good tennis on one day doesn't mean nadal is bad. Davydenko usually is very good in masters...thats how he maintains his rankings in the top 10
Re: Hail Nadal
by seventh sun on Oct 20, 2009 01:58 AM
remember he also beat Djokovic... Does that mean Djokovic is bad too ? all you kooan ke mendhak...open your eyes and see the truth... Davydenko was extreamly good on this day... Nadal was not bad..see the videos in youtube
why is rocky being blasted? no djoko,fed,delp..and he was so very lucky to get past ljubicic..if u did'nt see the match go watch it. and fed beat nadal before french open in straights in front of his home crowd..what r u talking about? its not fed's problem that nadal did'nt reach french open finals...
Re: rocky is correct
by Nagaprasad AR on Oct 18, 2009 10:36 AM
But you are forgetting that Nadal was injured and hence could not make it to the finals of French open and hence federer won. In all previous French opens Nadal beat Federer (in Finals) who was fully fit. Can't you see this simple fact buddy....Rocky was simply commenting abt Nadal's body which was purely personal....
Re: Re: rocky is correct
by chelsea on Oct 18, 2009 07:13 PM
The thing with Nadal is that there always seems something wrong with him. He already has an excuse planned if he doesn't make it. He keeps saying that he would give "100%" and you'd see him give 200% on the court. But when he loses, its some injury or the other. How many times have you seen him take an injury timeout when he's down a set or something. Nadal is not the only person that does that.
Re: Re: rocky is correct
by Michael on Oct 18, 2009 11:22 AM
Nadal lost in the 4th round to Soderling in the french open. He did not complain of any injury during that time and lost in four sets. So get your fact right.
Re: Re: Re: rocky is correct
by seventh sun on Oct 20, 2009 01:54 AM
yes...because if he did...men like you would say he's feigning injury and has an excuse
Nadal is a better tennis player than federer. facts prove it not emotions...see the head to head records
Re: Re: Re: Re: rocky is correct
by Kaustav Kakati on Oct 20, 2009 10:31 AM
richard krajicek had a lead over sampras in head-to-head meetings...does that mean he was a better player than sampras? u shud play tennis first before opening your illiterate mouth!
nadal can only win if the opponent is injured. without del potro, murray, federer, its his best chance and still davydenko is there uninjured.. the big but spanish may have the crowd support still he doesnt have the game
Re: A big but spanish
by Nagaprasad AR on Oct 17, 2009 08:27 PM
This shows your ignorance and foolishness. You told exactly the opposite of the truth. Whenever Nadal wasn't fit injured other players had been successful. The best example is Federer's French open victory. It seems you are jealous of Nadal's super tennis and his body. First go watch some tennis and then comment here... You foul mouth idiot...
Re: A big but spanish
by gautham s on Oct 17, 2009 11:49 PM
this amateuish comment seems to have been made to evoke responses from genuine tennis fans. Nyways rocky get well soon dear and then start posting ur comments...
Re: A big but spanish
by rohan varghese on Oct 17, 2009 08:37 PM
Nadal by far is among the top 10 tennis palayers the world has ever seen . Do you mean to say that he won the 6 slams he has because the other person was injured ...itwas just the opposite ...nadal when fully fit is a way above any one other than Roger among the current crop of players
