Federer proves he is the greatest

Re: Sampras vs Federer by Muthu Aravind on Jun 08, 2009 06:20 PM Federer is one of the greatest player and can become the greatest player of All Times when he beats Nadal at two or three Grand slams.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: cant compare federer and nadal by Atanu Chatterjee on Jun 08, 2009 03:17 PM Nadal is not better in any stretch of imagination as yet, but in the current era he is the only one consistently giving trouble to Federer and in last cpl of yrs even beyond the limit of french open. Another thing is Federer is late 20s, Nadal is early 20s. However my personal fav is Federer only.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: cant compare federer and nadal by Anurag Rathore on Jun 08, 2009 03:27 PM Nadal depends on his strength and stamina. As soon as time will progress Nadal will find difficult himself to win any Grandslam. You can see he has exhausted just after 1 year of his peak.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: cant compare federer and nadal by Anuraug Rathor on Jun 08, 2009 08:04 PM Funny to see that you are not exhausted of repeating the same crap ad nauseum.Get a life you moron,dont belittle the great achievements of Rafa.At least remember that if you belittle Rafa,you are belittling Federer-cos Rafa leads Federer head to head,has taken his No 1 ranking, and has beaten him on all surfaces including Wimbledon.Seek help my friend,you are more of a Fedex groupie than a fan.Respect both these great champions who have enriched tennis.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: its simple... by r subramani on Jun 08, 2009 10:29 PM Another Federer-idiotic fan..Can't you just appreciate a Man's achievement..U ppl are unfit to be federer fan..Fedex himself, considers Rafa a great player.. Let us think, Rafa is going to fade away in 2 yrs, but by that time, he will definitely be the owner of close to 10 slams, including a Grand Slam (after achieving US Open)..I m not saying Rafa is gr8 than Roger, but they are class in their own way..Robin had his day..And he will never going to make this kind in his life again..Players are considered gr8 only when they prove themselves over a period of time of which Fedx (Undoubtedly!) and Rafa(More Deservingly!!) have proved..And one more thing, Rafa has beaten Roger on all kind of GS courts..FO,WIM and AO..Soon he will (I say this yr) win US Open.. PPl like you are fitted to be in rehabilitaion centre than on a discussion board..get life dude..Get well soon.. Hail King Roger and Prince Rafa!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: its simple... by ryan on Jun 08, 2009 08:28 PM Don't forget Andre Agassi.. pure skill    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Federer is better than Nadal..... by Anuraug Rathor on Jun 08, 2009 08:10 PM Thanks for providing the stats,moron.Now lets dissect them.I will make it simple so that retards like you can understand clearly.So Fedex leads on grass and indoor, so that makes him a better player?What kind of stupid logic is this?Is clay not an integral part of tennis?Federer doesnt even have a clear lead anywhere except indoor.Please think before you try to prove your intelligence here.Next..Rafa already has 36 titles to 58,being much junior to Fedex.You conveniently omitted this.Same for Grand Slams...already half of Fedex with an Olympic Gold to boot!Career singles..again flawed.Current year record...Rafa is ahead.It just proves that you can provide the data even to a retard,but he wont be able to analyse it!.Thanks for making my job simple.Now sit home and do your homework.Good night.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Federer is better than Nadal..... by shiv kumar on Jun 08, 2009 09:07 PM Dear Mr. Anurag sorry to intrude betwixt your angry outburst agaist the stats provided by the earlier mail. Siphoning stats is a singular somotological disorder of this era. They don't prove who is a better tennis player. Yes. Stats can never prove that Roger is a better tennis player than Rafa. Rafa, the tennis machine, would beed more frquent overhauls before it sputters off. Who looke more tired in the semis - Roger or Pedro? And, what is their age difference? I am yet to see Roger physically tired. Emotionally drained - yes. He can play for three more years easily, though not at his peak, but enough to beat tennis machines. I only hope that he has overcome his fear of machines. Who isn't?    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: Federer is better than Nadal..... by thangaraj V on Jun 08, 2009 09:56 PM Both Pete and agassi call FedEx as the greatest Tennis player ever.They have seen Bjorg,lyndl ,rod laver and many other greats at their best but they still say roger is the best ever.This ends it all.No stats needed to prove who is the greatest ever.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Federer is better than Nadal..... by bango tango on Jun 08, 2009 02:55 PM hey Anurag , thanks 4 being God Federer fan...can u plz send me a mail in this rediff id , bango.tango so that we can be frds... CHEERS FOR BEING A FEDEX FAN...    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Federer is better than Nadal..... by Anurag Rathore on Jun 08, 2009 03:00 PM anuragrathore1983    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Federer is better than Nadal..... by Anurag Rathore on Jun 08, 2009 02:53 PM Stats are before final. Now Federer has 14 Grandslams in his pocket.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Sampras v. Marat Safin (RUS) by Prasad Vasudevan on Jun 08, 2009 07:56 PM I wonder how many of those wins by Pete's rivals, have come on grand slams. When it comes to grand slams top 5 players including sampras play(ed) at a different level.    Forward   |   Report abuse