My clone named "Anuraug Rathor" is a big moron. Ignore his statements.
When Sampras, Borg, Aggasi, B.Becker etc have told Federer as all time best, there is no need to read statements of my stupid clone. He doesn't know anything about Tennis. If Nadal will play cricket he will say Nadal is all time best cricketer!
Re: Hello guys....
by Anuraug Rathor on Jul 09, 2009 03:29 PM
Agassi also said Nadal will win the Grans Slam this year...so did Becker,so think before you spout nonsense here clone boy
Re: Re: Hello guys....
by dilip nenmelil on Jul 09, 2009 05:44 PM
Whatever said and done Nadal has an upperhand over fed in the finals of major tournaments.Also there head to head stat is 13-7 infavour of Rafa...no more comments
It’s not merely Federer’s five U.S. Opens, three Australians, one French and six Wimbledons — a record of 15 Grand Slam singles titles, one better now, as the world knows, than Pete Sampras. It’s not just his 21 consecutive Grand Slam semifinals. It’s not only his relentless consistency, uncanny timing, impossible angles, ferocious forehand, dinking deftness or big-point cool No, there’s something else at work here. People develop Federer obsessions the way teenagers have crushes. They can’t get the guy out of their heads. The late novelist David Foster Wallace, a devotee, said of one Federer forehand against Andre Agassi that, “It was impossible. It was like something out of ‘The Matrix. So is Federer real, or is he in fact the computer-simulated perfect tennis player, a science fiction hero, his body heat drawn invisibly into energy creation, switching from slice to topspin backhand on the basis of some nerd’s formula no opponent can grasp or grapple with for long? when Vavrinec gives birth in the next few weeks, I’d say there’s a case for the Association of Tennis Professionals ordering a quick examination of what flows in the baby’s veins. we can ask the masterful, charming and irresistible Federer to take the red pill and reveal all to the human world...article recently published
Re: Federer...the greatest modern era tennis player
by Anuraug Rathor on Jul 09, 2009 09:55 AM
Even computer simulated so called perfect players ahve their flaws.Gary Kasparov and Vishwanathan Anand regularly defeated chess supercomputers,and Rafael Nadal regularly reduces the tennis computer to tears.I agree we should order an examination of his kid though....to see if the Nadal phobia is something genetic or acquired.
Re: Re: Federer...the greatest modern era tennis player
by Anurag Rathore on Jul 09, 2009 12:46 PM
So you think we should say Kasparov and V.Anand are better than Supercomputer.It's funny.
Even they(Nadal) won sometimes against supercomputer(Federer) still supercomputer will be called better than them.
Re: Re: Re: Federer...the greatest modern era tennis player
by Anuraug Rathor on Jul 09, 2009 04:22 PM
I said REGULARLY,moron clone boy.Learn to read first
Re: Federer...the greatest modern era tennis player
by Anuraug Rathor on Jul 09, 2009 09:56 AM
Obsessions are unhealthy,even if they are obsessions about tennsi players or so called perfect tennis players.So if you cant get Federer out of your head and get on with your life, a quick medical and mental examination on yourself is in order.
Re: Re: Re: Federer...the greatest modern era tennis player
by rakesh singh on Jul 09, 2009 11:56 AM
seriously after the High Court bench has termed consensual sex between adults of the same sex legal, i can imagine why Anurag is singing praises for Nadal...c'mon Anurag we know ur intentions keep going
Re: Re: Re: Re: Federer...the greatest modern era tennis player
by Anuraug Rathor on Jul 09, 2009 04:23 PM
They say a GAY would know another one better....so if you think I am gay you must be right.Seriously man Rakesh Singh,get your mind out of the gutter and think straight for once will you?
