Mr. Anurag Rathore, According to you Roddick played well but Federer won luckily. Last year Nadal won but not on luck. Why two different views for two five set matches. That shows you are chamcha of nadal and you hate Federer. And coming to being junior I think you dont understand english. Kishore has written that Federer has achieved a lot in the span of 7 years. That means even Nadal plays for another 10 years and wins 30 Grandslams he will still not be considered better than Federer if he doesnot achie in 2 more years what Federer has achieved in 7 years. And as you rightly said I think you are very close to Nadal(Hey they made the Gay Law legal) why is that you always crib on Federers crying. Sportsmen also cry with ecstasy and the emotions they show are out of the pressure that is released after winning. Couch potatoes who know only writing blogs will not know what sport is all about. You and Aishwarya Patil have reached a stage where you have become a nusiance on the rediff blog. You dont understand the game nor you understand English.
True any tennis player who has ever been ranked in top 10 is a top plyr tennis is the most competitive sport coz of its profile and coz its an individual sport one feels sorry for andy roddick, he choked but played overall better than feddy i can only say that one is lucky to have had feddy and laver laver and fedex are champs tennis has a different history in the past-grand slams were not most important and hence plyrs like laver turned pro one salutes laver and feddy great champs. we wud never know how great feddy is as he said himself coz you cant compare opponents of the best players of their time and coz majors were not considered so important before rod laver missed 100s of majors coz of turning pro and contracted pro and was not allowed to play those days, all best plyrs turned pro laver has won a stagerring 199 singles titles plus any no of doubles and mixed doubles the great laver wud have won many more than his 11 singles majors he missed 21 in a row and more just before sweeping all in 69 and after sweeping all in 62 when he use to win every match he missed many in the 70s too he was a true legend people who saw him play at his peak or othrwise say its laver first and then daylight he is someone with most kind and humble words long live laver the champion likewise maragret court wud have won more than her record 24 singles majors anyway-shes the best ever i dont read posts i dont reply to
Re: well tell u
by Bhasmasur Rakshas on Jul 06, 2009 12:27 PM
You must be quite old to appreciate the greatness of Rod Laver and ignore the greatness of modern day greats like Federer and Sampras......
well media every now and then discusses as to why cricket is loved more in our country....
this is pretty much the reason.....sania mirza probably would be the most over-rated and over-hyped tennis player in the world has hardly managed to get past 2nd round in grandslams for last 5yrs and still she is in Ads and news....
This match was after the Fed V Rod match with 15,000 people. After that match, almost everyone left even though they had the ticket the watch the game. The mixed game was played before 10 people. It just shows how much people rate mixed doubles. LOL
