No matter which andy joins federer in the final, but it's going to be really boring......we allo know who is going to win...That is why withdrawing of nadal was the biggest setback this wimbledon could had.....with these 2 players competing, u never know who might come out of top.I hope though, that the final is an interesting one......
Re: Boring Final
by Guest on Jul 03, 2009 11:39 PM
why cant you leave the injured man alone? he is great pain after losing to soderling in the 4th round at french open. once he is fit and mentally strong he will play. nadal is on cycle trying to catch roger who is on a ferrari.
Re: Re: Boring Final
by Tom Cruise on Jul 04, 2009 12:05 PM
good one but roger does not have to be on a ferrari, a tricycle would do for him, he is that good..go roger go...
i dont have words ....he has been told by the whole world he is no more.......but still he has reached almost all the grand slam finals...that nadal used some power now he is in bed...u need discipline and professionalism in game which fedex have...same has been with sampras...both r kohinoor to the tennis........
Re: fedEx...
by arun balan on Jul 03, 2009 10:42 PM
prasad power n stamina is part of Nadals game, Federer is njoying his time bcse Nadal is injured. Nadal is a better plyr than Fedex
Re: Re: fedEx...
by arshad saeed on Jul 03, 2009 11:50 PM
Let Nadal reach 27 and play like Federer is playing now. Nadal is burning out fast and he will soon disappear from the scene if he is not fit enough at this age. Federer is fitness personified.
Re: Re: fedEx...
by Hindustani on Jul 04, 2009 09:41 AM
Arun balan No doubt Nadal is one of the best players of all time but he is certainly not a better player than federer. Federer is sheer class whereas with Nadal its more of power and stamina that keeps him going. With the kind of game he has he is bound to face injuries in the future too.
Re: Re: fedEx...
by SREENU RAO on Jul 04, 2009 10:46 AM
Dear Arun Balan, Did Federer have an injury at the age of 22 like Nadal has now. How can Nadal be a great player when he cant even play at the age of 22. If youe were a sportsman then you will know hwat the coaches first teach. Competing is important not winning. Federer has been doing that for 7 years now. Now who is great. Use your brain. Dont just give biased opinions because you are a fan of Nadal. The problem with 80% of todays blog writers is that they have not held Tennis raquet in their life but still make themselves eligible to decide who is the greatest palyer.
Re: Re: fedEx...
by Manian Vasudevan on Jul 03, 2009 11:31 PM
Mr Arun Balan. Being a successful player is totally different from being a charming, elegant and graceful champion. Federer is classic player and Nadal can never come anywhere near him, even if Nadal goes on to win 50 Grand Slam titles. Federer is unmatchable. Nadal became World No 1, just because, he plays every possible tournamnets and collecting points rom inconsequential players. Federer is playing selectively and so being injury-free.
Re: Re: Re: fedEx...
by tanmoy on Jul 04, 2009 12:24 AM
@manian "Nadal became World No 1, just because, he plays every possible tournamnets and collecting points rom inconsequential players. Federer is playing selectively and so being injury-free." I have never read such a stupid comment........do u know what tennis is????I agreed nadal can never become federer..........federer is all time gr8...........that doesnot mean nadal is not good player.........and ur comment abt selective tournament,I hardly doubt u ever watch tennis or not..........I know u dont know what master series is........nadal has won many masters tournament and wimbledon,last yr and thats too by beating fedex,thats why he became no. 1.........and just check the facts how many tournaments nadal played and how many fedex played......
Re: Re: Re: Re: fedEx...
by Duraisamy mahendran on Jul 04, 2009 10:14 AM
No, plz check the tournament he played between aus open and french open 2008. Even one arg clay court great mentioned this point.
