I have watched the game, really wonderful game it was, but unfortunately thomas played some bad game at last two sets. But one thing was sure that federer was palayed a wonderful knock of his life. Really amazing services and shots he has produced in last three sets. it was really amazing moments one has to accept the federer as a champion. Still there are players like novak. murray, nadal is there for stopping federer to clinch the title, but i think he may surpassed to them and come up with trophy this time. i hope so. Actually i m new for this message area. so please friends allow me to write msg here. take care bye
it does not matter watever words you people discuss in but the ultimate point is that fedex is in the next round....and there is no stopping him now....talking about gr8ness...is a person not considered gr8 if he holds number 1 for 247 weeks......lets see if nadal can hold it for even 247 days!!!!he is on his way to the next grandslam victory....
I saw this match. Roger Federer was indeed lucky to win this one. The turnaround in this match happened not because of any brilliance on part of Federer. It was rather due to Berdych missing some easy shots! If this is how Federer is going to play in the semi-final and final (should he reach there), his opponents are just going to be all over him. May be Djokovic, when his said after his U.S. Open final loss to Federer in 2007 that, " Federer is NOT Great, he is just lucky. He goes for the lines, and generally hits them.", was right after all. What do you say dear Anurag Rathore?
Re: aishwarya patil
by kareem on Jan 25, 2009 09:06 PM
my dear aish, prayed a lot agaiast great federer, you got some frustration right? anyway Nadal cannot go beyond semifinal, exprts says after 2 sets federer got his form back(not after match)same thing happened , u know what is the difference between muscle power and class?watch nadal's and federer tennis, who like terrible noise, who like muscle they can go after anybody, but don't vomit out anything against federer. (same like sachin dhoni comparison)
Re: aishwarya patil
by kareem on Jan 25, 2009 09:12 PM
after us open final, he made one more titile there, he lost in semifinal agianst federer, what he said??
Re: aishwarya patil
by aishwarya patil on Jan 25, 2009 06:11 PM
I forgot to mention that there is still a match to be played before the semi-finals. Federer is going to struggle against Del Potro as well.
Re: aishwarya patil
by LAKSHMINARAYAN SRINIVAS on Jan 27, 2009 09:34 AM
when the mighty aussies were winning all the matches played by them it was not just that they played well but because of umpiring errors against the opponents and some silly mistakes by the opposition team. still everyone claimed that the aussies are great as if they won it purely by themselves. in the same way u cannot compare an individual sports. just the sheer presence of federer in the court itself is more than enough to make people distract. coupled with his greatness and the opponents lack to finish off the games makes him great. whatever it it he is still the greatest.
Re: aishwarya patil
by A Singh on Jan 25, 2009 06:22 PM
Halo aish I have to say that out of all the subjects you comment upon, you are at your most sensible when you are on Tennis. Your comment above however, thogh sensible, seems just a little bias against Federer. Federer may not be as great as Mr Anurag Rathore thinks he is, but still, he has not done anything to deserve your contempt. He has already done so much for the game, that he will always be mentioned as one of all time Greats. Nadal, one day may surpass his achievements; he has that talent and the spirit to do it, but as of now, he is miles behind Federer, when you comapare Life-time achievements. Even in this match, you have to give some credit to Federer for hanging on, even if with the aid of some fortune! In the first about 2 and 1/2 sets, Berdych was serving so well, that Federer had no chance. It was only after he began to tire, and his first serve percentages began to drop, that Federer slowly clawed back into the match. But you are right. Federer will have to play much better, if he has to win the title.
Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by indiamachinetools on Jan 25, 2009 07:56 PM
as a jyotish, having read Fedex chart lagna and all kundali - his winning yoga-maha-dasha or duration of lord saturn/shanishwara is over. He will retire before next year. Fedex is gone from tennis forever soon.
This is only because Mercury (lord of 2nd and 11th houses, which are good house) is located in the 12th which is loss house. So he will struggle due to this - material loss, meaning title, money will not be same as before.
This is why you see him struggle. HE IS RUNNING LORD BUDHA(MERCURY) MAHADASHA WITH ANTARDASHA/SUB-DURATION OR BHUKTI - LORDMERCURY RIGHT NOW.
WHEN LORD SATURN MOVES OUT OF LEO./SIMHA RASHI HIS CAREER IS ALMOST FINISHED.
Re: Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by aishwarya patil on Jan 26, 2009 03:40 PM
I do not know about your claims to being an astrologer, but I too, have got some experience in the subject. I have observed that the rules of Astrology are made for ordinary (middle class) people. Great men and people born very poor are hardly affected by planets. Those who rely on the strength of their arms to get results, generally get them, no matter what the planetary position is. Rafael Nadal's is a case to prove this point. He has earned everything by the sweat of his brow, and not because his Mahadasha or Antardasha has changed. Federer too, belongs to the select group, who write their own fate. He has aged, and that is all. I can assure you that he is not going to retire this year or the next or the next. He is not going to dominate like in the past, but he is going to win some big tournaments, and is going to remain a feared opponent, even for the best of the best. In my original post, I have written something to excite Anurag Rathore. I don't know how he has not reacted so far.
Re: Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by chelsea on Jan 25, 2009 09:35 PM
oh really..I doubt Federer gives a crap. Anyways, what have you got to say about Nadal, Murray and Djokovic ?
Re: aishwarya patil
by sanjeet kumar on Jan 27, 2009 02:30 AM
This is the normal tendecies of human, they always compare. Great should behave good in bad time too and come up with good results for that he been known. All Big four in tennis world are having talent and calliber to clinch a title. But Federer has given many ideas & shots to tennis which was not discussed in tennis book before. But other three has only shown energy and short term tactis. Lets wait for result and expect good tennis from fav four and understand the shot. Sachin falis some times but he alwas comes with great knock, like him Federer(Schin fan of federer) will come up with good result.
Re: aishwarya patil
by kareem on Jan 25, 2009 09:08 PM
tomihas played better than nadal, but he made lot off mistakes, thus why he lost, can i say like this?
Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by abishek on Jan 26, 2009 07:46 PM
I have watched the game, really wonderful game it was, but unfortunately thomas played some bad game at last two sets. But one thing was sure that federer was palayed a wonderful knock of his life. Really amazing services and shots he has produced in last three sets. it was really amazing moments one has to accept the federer as a champion. Still there are players like novak. murray, nadal is there for stopping federer to clinch the title, but i think he may surpassed to them and come up with trophy this time. i hope so. Actually i m new for this message area. so please friends allow me to write msg here. take care bye
