Avram Grant was better than Scolari,his record was identical to that of Jose Mourinho,so he should get a second chance,after all he has experience of English football,chelsea must also try to get some more new players such as Van Der Vaart and Xavi Hernandez
Re: Get Grant Back!!!
by Praveen M on Feb 10, 2009 10:49 AM
chelsea team is filled with gud players. all they need is motivation & coach who knows english style of football
Scolari's outster is not unexpected as under Mourinho Chelsea never lost at home. The standard he set was very high. Scolari could not meet the high expectations & so was fired. U cant win the league if u lose against top sides like Manu & Liverpool at home. Change was necessary. Zola might be the new coach.
Re: Better Things to come
by Umesh Sharma on Feb 10, 2009 11:07 AM
ashish, even a new born takes 9 months in the womb, here scolari was handling a team which was formed by some one ealse, he shud hv bn gvn the time , mourinho has managed teams in europe all his life and knows the brand of football played where as scolari is more of the south american type, he shud hv been persisted. anyways he will probably land at man city after mark gets the boot from man city.it is h'ever a pleasure to watch the league games, ultimately one gets to see the best brand of football in the world.
Will this be the trend in IPL this season ? last season itseld, Mallya had sacked Charu Sharma, the CEO and just be fore the season started, VVS Laxman has been divested of the captaincy.
you can have more fun off the cricket field than on the field this season !! have fun !!!
Re: Re: football?
by veethividangan Vaithilingam on Feb 10, 2009 10:47 AM
he will ask who is Ronaldo and what is Robinho. Mate, forget it abot these mad characters. For them, only cricket is the game. Let GOD save us and our country from these mad fellows.
Re: football?
by Umesh Sharma on Feb 10, 2009 10:51 AM
mr target, if you donot know anything abt any subject why comment? for yr info sake this sport is watched by millions around the globe and is the most popular sport of the world, unlike cricket which has hardly 11 nations playing and you call it world cup.
Re: football?
by Arvind on Feb 10, 2009 10:27 AM
Bull shits like you doesn't know the value of Football. I think you are addicted the fools game of Cricket. Football doesn't needs certification from a fool like you.
Re: football?
by dev freyas on Feb 10, 2009 11:32 AM
dude!!! ur having fun right, instigating people with ur silly comments. U know why i stopped watching cricket. due to blokes like u who cant stop thinking outside your cricket nutshell. Get a life!! Man
Sacking managers has been what Chelsea is doing these days. What about the players who underperformed. Is it okay to put the blame only on the manager??? But on a second thought, i have seen how Chelsea play the last match against Hull City, a totally hopeless side with no motivation at all, everyone seems to be playing for their own, far from being the team play they once were.
Re: Chelsea on sacking spree
by P ROHIT on Feb 10, 2009 09:26 AM
Hull City is not a hopeless side at all. They have got more points than any promoted team did have in theor first 15 games. they were once third in the standings.just going thru a lean patch.they are definitely not going to be reegated!
Re: Re: Chelsea on sacking spree
by mang buhril on Feb 10, 2009 09:43 AM
Hi P Rohit, hopeless here means Chelsea in the context of that game, not Hull city in any way. Hull City is an amazing size which can give any team a run for their money.
Re: Re: Chelsea on sacking spree
by Deepak MA on Feb 10, 2009 09:43 AM
Bugger Rohit, the last statement is referred to Chelsea. Guys, please read properly and then go to correct others.
Re: Chelsea on sacking spree
by veethividangan Vaithilingam on Feb 10, 2009 10:50 AM
EPL making record by sacking two managers on single day. It is not only Scolari also Tony Admans was scaked by Portsmouth. May be one day there may not be any managers in EPL. hahahha
Re: Chelsea on sacking spree
by Umesh Sharma on Feb 10, 2009 11:13 AM
mang , the team is the same, but the prob is with the approach of scolari who has changed the formation from man to man defense to zonal marking which the players cud not adapt. added to this was the injuries to some players in mid field. though am a man u fan, wud like chelsea to gv a tough fight to others, they hv been playing good attractive footbal till recently, after all it makes two good teams to give a spectator a interesting game.
Re: ?
by James George on Feb 10, 2009 10:07 AM
Get a life or take a shower and move on with your screwed up life.... Theres a life outside the nutshell you live in....
Re: ?
by dev freyas on Feb 10, 2009 09:23 AM
like your sarcasm man!!! If you are a fan of football. Hats off to you. If you are a fan of cricket. Piss off from this post.
Re: ?
by kalyanaraman s. on Feb 10, 2009 10:12 AM
they are related !
both in cricket and football, they chase 1 ball, despite having...............!!
there are 11 players in each side. just the difference is that on the field at any time, there are 13 players in cricket (and 15 if you include the umpires), whereas in football, there are 25 players (22 3). the other difference is that cricket players dress like traditional naarishus, while football players dress like bollywood heroines !
