As we expected , playing each shot with full straing ,I mensioned earlier , there is lot of chance to get injury because everybody know why. one more thig Nadal was not faverote for title, battle anyway between murry and federer, dosn't matter nadal play or not.
Re: Nadal
by Vijayawada Sitaramanjaneyula Rajasekhara Yarlagadda Srinivasa Venkata Samba Siva Reddy... on Nov 04, 2008 12:32 PM
ha ha this is just the beginning... All nadal supporters wait for the next 2 years; when you'll see Nadal pulling from many more tournaments maybe including the majors. I hope everyone now realises that it takes a "ROGER FEDERER" to be at the helm of one's career for 4-5 long years; remaining injury-free and staying no.1 all the time...
Re: Nadal
by Aaloo Prasad on Nov 04, 2008 01:11 PM
Mr Vijayawada Sitaramanjaneyula Rajasekhara Yarlagadda Srinivasa Venkata Samba Siva Reddy, are you an astrologer?
Re: Nadal
by tanmoy on Nov 04, 2008 05:21 PM
Kareem and Vijaywada,how many tournaments u have won in ur career in tennis????Did u ever hold a racket????Did u ever won a gold medal in Olympics and proud the nation????????1st do all this then comment abt any gr8 player.Everybody knows(even Nadal' supporters) that federer is probably(may be sampras) all time gr8 tennis player.So dont compare nadal with him.BTW Nadal is only 22 and tell me how many people(in male category)have won 5 or more grandslams????How many have won SIngles olympics Gold medal???How many have won 12 Master's series(3rd highest, so far Agassi have won 17 and the federer 14)???If that was not a gr8 career already in a tough cometitive sports then sorry to say u both dont have no knowledge of tennis.
Re: Nadal
by kareem on Nov 05, 2008 11:13 AM
Dear tanny , it is great You won gold medal and granslam in tennis(whoo) what are you trying to prove?Your tennsi knowledge?well have You visited in this forum during french open and wimbildon? Nadal fans used to bleme Federer as his age and they were trying to prove Nadal far better than federer etc... can you tell me or prove me what wrong statement I made? I used to write same thing nadal always trying very hard, he dosn't have much skill as federer a lot of chance getting injury for sure.. In hard court nadal is not second best player now, it is andy murry any doubt about this? one more thing personally You have serious problem,because Your statement , I am sorry that You had mental shock or something like that.
Re: Nadal
by anupam trivedi on Nov 05, 2008 03:16 PM
hard court record- play won lost title nadal-2008 56 46 10 total 195 145 50 7 murry-2008 49 40 9 total 148 109 39 7 federer-2008 41 33 8 total 438 362 76 38 djokovic-2008 50 39 11 total 137 101 36 7
we see nadal is no.1. at this year plz tell only fact not your assumptions.
Re: Nadal
by kareem on Nov 05, 2008 03:42 PM
Anupam trying to prove hard court record , how many hard court granslam title won by Nadal??in this yeasr how many?
Re: Nadal
by anupam trivedi on Nov 05, 2008 09:49 PM
How many won by Murray? nadal is semifinalist of AUS & US open while murray finalist of US & lost in 1st Round in AUS OPEN.
