Nadal might become No.1 by the end of the year but he will lose it next year. Nadal will have a truckload of points to defend while fedex will have everything to gain.
RE:Fedex Rulezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
by braze dude on Jul 23, 2008 03:07 PM
Exactly, this bekaar fella is moaning ...frigging idiot...
RE:Only federer
by shubhankar sharma on Jul 24, 2008 04:47 PM
if u dont know who becker is, you should stop watching tennis you fool!! he is the youngest ever champion at wimbledon at age 17, idiot!
what Becker's say is totally wrong. continue 5 times wimbldon campion is not a joke. if nadal give that much consistency then thought about nadal before that i simply say the federer was the best tennis player of the world. after all federer is a human.
Boris Becker has played under the same ranking system - points getting added and dropping off on previous 12 months performance on the computer - and enjoyed its benefits. Hence, for him to say that Federer is not no.1 even when the computer says so is not correct. No one grudges Nadal his status today and he is certainly the no.1 player of 2008. But over the last 12 months, Federer's consistency has paid off and he continues to be no.1 in spite of a bad 2008. Even after such a bad 2008 if Nadal has been unable to overtake Federer, it shows the greatness of Federer. So, stop talking nonsense and respect Federer or change the ranking system!
RE:Really, Boris Becker?
by prajeesh menon on Jul 22, 2008 01:46 PM
for me stl Pete Sampras is number one player in tennis.......i would love to see a exbtion match btween Nadal Vs Sampras
RE:Really, Boris Becker?
by Saurabh Sahai on Jul 22, 2008 03:03 PM
This is the best and the sisest comment I have ever come across - But over the last 12 months, Federer's consistency has paid off and he continues to be no.1 in spite of a bad 2008 -
RE:Really, Boris Becker?
by EJAZ KHAN on Jul 22, 2008 04:37 PM
My dear nadal had already won french open and wimeldon this year that too against federer. is it not enough for u?
RE:Really, Boris Becker?
by PUNEESH on Jul 22, 2008 07:15 PM
my dear...doing it for half an year and consistently winning it for year over year is a different thing.
RE:Really, Boris Becker?
by karan malhotra on Jul 23, 2008 11:52 AM
when ur number one u have to be the ultimate player which federer has been for the past couple of years.Nadal is playing very well but he would have to continue playing well as now federer has a reason to play better and now has a challenge to work on.H e will come out with flying colours.When tiger woods was playing last year he was only able to win one major but still ended up being the best at the end.Everyone slips its just human but the great fight the situation and come back on top .The final could have gone either way at wimbeldon.Federer will be back
Nadal can't replace federer from no.1 position at least 2 more year. It doesn't matter that he lost the Both final(Wimbledon and French Open). Fact is that federer reached all the three grand slam final this year, but nadal was not in the Australia open final.
RE:Federer is no.1
by Harit Shah on Jul 22, 2008 11:46 AM
Excuse me, but there is a LITTLE mistake here - Federer DID NOT reach the Australian Open Final, it was Tsonga v/s Djokovic, so get your facts right, dude! Or are you already assuming that Fed will reach the US Open finals? Hahaha!
RE:Federer is no.1
by Anurag Rathore on Jul 22, 2008 12:35 PM
It's a mistake by me, fedrer lost the semifinal by jochovic in Aus.open. But that result doesn't effect on his consistency. We will definitely see federer in U.S.Open final. But we can't say that about Nadal.
