Cant compare Fedex and Nadal. But are diffierent in the mindset and playing strategy. did u ever see Fedex working very for a point, and did u ever see ralf taking atleast a single point lightly.. Fedex is a mixture of intellegence and talent. Ralf is mixture of strength and commitment. Both are the best qualities. and each one will dominate in their own way, Think once if nadal gets an injury after recovery definately he cant show that strength, here minggame plays a majore role.
Fedex is the superior to nadal except on clay... NaDAL IS the king of caly...
RE:Fedrer and nadal champs in their own style
by manoj krishnamachar on Aug 04, 2008 10:43 AM
but you can already see FEDEX has lost the sheen this year!! he looks jaded most of the time and once a dominant player looks very vulnerable in every point!! it is now or never for FEDEX else his glory days will be over!! i really doubt whether he will ever win another GRANDSLAM unless he REFORMS HIMSELF!!
RE:Djoker
by Madguy on Aug 04, 2008 10:55 AM
Good Reply kaushik. People really dont know to admire talent and hard work. They are just jealous of rise of Rafa.
RE:Djoker
by rana basu on Aug 04, 2008 10:04 AM
cant call nadal an emperor. he lacks any grace (playing style, looks , name it) that befits that title. but rustics like you may always look up to him as your emperor.
RE:RE:Djoker
by PUNEESH on Aug 04, 2008 10:49 AM
well mr saha....nadal might be your favourite player...but dont say bad things about a player who has won dominated tennis for 4 and half years and has been no 1 for record weeks...talking about nadal....he might have won wimbledon this time(deservingly) but that does not mean he is a world beater...we will soon see what he can do on hard courts.
RE:Djoker
by Guest on Aug 04, 2008 10:40 AM
Mr Kaushik Ji, Winning one match or losing one match doesn't make any body winner or loser. In order to be great he has to maintain consistency in all aspects of the game for a while like Federer.
RE:Djoker
by parthasarathy sarathy on Aug 04, 2008 11:40 AM
All those who are arguing exclusively for Federer or Nadal are missing the main point, as they are biased. The main point is that this era of Tennis is witness to a great rivalry between two accomplished champions, Federer already certainly a very very accomplished champion and Nadal trying to get into that elite club. The 1980 Wimbledon final between Borg and McEnroe was the first W Final telecast live in India and I wantched that on TV. At the end of the match, what emerged was a very great rivalry between a gifted young brash American and a cool, icy Swede who had already proved himself beyond doubt with too many French and Wimbledon titles. Similarly, Fedex - Nadal is a great clash and they are lighting up the courts. Nadal has shown that he has the ability to beat Federer or push him very hard (like last year's W Final). What is sad is that Federer is not losing only to a Nadal or a Djokovic but to all and sundry below them also, and on different surfaces. Hope he captures back his old magic and Nadal improves further on hard courts and grass. That's the Tennis that I would like to watch
