Re: Re: now
by Shyam Galgali on Jan 08, 2019 02:20 PM
still enquiry report has to come out and please remember there are series of cases where judiciary has delayed the workmen died starving. not understood what was the urgency in this matter. if sc is to act effectively in labour matters as well there would be great relief. alas that won't happen becoz sc is meant for only big shots / t....r...i....s.... and not for r...a... dir..
Re: now
by NEELAKANTAN R on Jan 08, 2019 02:32 PM
Yes Common man, after giving a judgement on sabarimala issue and messing up the total law and order of a state, the same SC clarify the state should not use force to implement the order. Those who wants to go they can go.
Re: now
by NEELAKANTAN R on Jan 08, 2019 02:33 PM
Yes Common man, after giving a judgement on sabarimala issue and messing up the total law and order of a state, the same SC clarify the state should not use force to implement the order. Those who wants to go they can go.
Re: Re: now
by common man on Jan 08, 2019 02:40 PM
AS FAR AS SABRIMALA issue iam of the view that SC or any other judiciary should not interfere in relgous/rituals/cultural matters of any community
finally someone in the judiciary is willing to take the risk of slapping namo....he needs many more slaps if this country has to function in a democratic way.
Re: finally someone willing to slap namo
by jaidyal pal on Jan 08, 2019 01:42 PM
Why not it should be slap on thinker like you who are getting fed in this country buy still dare to dispect the highest office of this Nation as it won't suit them . This types of vatican Bhaghat must be dispatched to Vatican @ the earliest because their rule is the best.
Re: Re: finally someone willing to slap namo
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 01:48 PM
All elected represenattives are answerable to public.If SUpreme Court doenot slap them then the right to slap is reserved for the common man??????????????
Re: Re: Re: finally someone willing to slap namo
by P S SHAH on Jan 08, 2019 08:06 PM
Do you have guts to ask any question to the elected representative in your state ?
Re: Re: finally someone willing to slap namo
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 01:49 PM
All elected represenattives are answerable to public.If SUpreme Court doesnot slap them then the right to slap is reserved for the common man??????????????
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: finally someone willing to slap namo
by RAJ on Jan 08, 2019 02:21 PM
fake name yadava , ur IP address is now tracked by agencies. New bill shall become a law soon. Jai Hind Read the judgement , Verma will not take any decision and he is retiring b4 that
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: finally someone willing to slap namo
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 02:28 PM
Your tracking my Ip wiill not save the Jhumlaa Party from Doooooooooooooooom!!! JaiBHIM_jaiBharat!!!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: finally someone willing to slap namo
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 02:28 PM
Your tracking my Ip wiill not save the Jhumlaa Party from Doooooooooooooooom!!! JaiBHIM_jaiBharat!!!
finally someone in the judiciary is willing to take the risk of slapping namo....he needs many more slaps if this country has to function in a democratic way.
This will be considered one of the major judgements upholding the independence of institutions and their selection stipulations. This is a jolt and warning to erring and over-reaching governments like Modi's
Re: Independence of CBI
by yahoo on Jan 08, 2019 12:32 PM
it is not jolt for government, he is director only for 1 week until high powered committee selects a new director.
Re: Re: Independence of CBI
by Namakkal Raghavendran on Jan 08, 2019 12:58 PM
Sorry, wrong! The Committee cannot select a new Director unless it finds that the charges are established. At any rate it is a slap in the face of the PM for acting hastily at the instance of his protege spl director
Re: Re: Re: Independence of CBI
by RAJ on Jan 08, 2019 02:23 PM
Hv u read the judgement and also aware on his retirement date. To dilute his insult , this judgement given and also to control future controversies by new Govt
Re: Re: Re: Re: Independence of CBI
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 02:30 PM
This jujgement has insulted the JhumlaaaaaaVadeeeeeeeeeees!!!!!!!!
Govt. must have policy of hire and fire like private sector to bring clean image and efficiency in its working. Why tainted officers are allowed to be promoted later on or all officers must retire on army pattern where in majority of cases a Lt. Col. retires at 50.
Re: Alok
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 12:06 PM
it was the govt who was responsible for bringing biased ,aprtial chamchaaaaaaaas to the CBi,hence the consequences!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Alok
by rajesh venkatraman on Jan 08, 2019 12:13 PM
why reinstate him when the inquiry still needs to be completed by the CVC. Also if the CBI chief cannot take decision until he is cleared by the CVC and action to be taken is by the selection committee of the govt representatives and LoP. Also his tenure is till this month end. This judgement serves no purpose as the committee is to be called in a weeks time and decide on the fate of the CBI chief will take time of atleast 10-15 working days and there are more than 10 holidays in this month
Re: Re: Alok
by Namakkal Raghavendran on Jan 08, 2019 01:00 PM
The very fact that he was reinstated even for this short duration is seen to emphasise the error of the PM's order.
Re: Re: Re: Alok
by arungopal agarwal on Jan 08, 2019 12:36 PM
When such reform will come, Modi also gave up. Let us know next hope, Rahul is no better.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alok
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 12:49 PM
Now where is the QUEStion of Rahooooooooooool?????????? With the Master_Jhumla_stroke of 10% Uppercaste reservations,Modi Sir will win 500 seats with Opposition mukt Bharat & Lokasabha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Govt. must have policy of hire and fire like private sector to bring clean image and efficiency in its working. Why tainted officers are allowed to be promoted later on or all officers must retire on army pattern where in majority of cases a Lt. Col. retires at 50.
Re: Alok
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 12:06 PM
it was the govt who was responsible for bringing biased ,aprtial chamchaaaaaaaas to the CBi,hence the consequences!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SC had set aside the order not that it lacked merit, but only on the ground that there was a procedural error. When two senior officers were fighting the act done by the government was Right. Otherwise it would have been another case of Justice Karnan fighting with SC Judges and washing dirty linen in public.
Re: Read the SC Order
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 12:04 PM
it was the govt who was responsible for bringing biased ,aprtial chamchaaaaaaaas to the CBi,hence the consequences!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the supreme court is interfering in every order of government this is not good. the general public pending decision in court should first give them which are hanging upon them for many years.
Re: supre court
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 12:04 PM
it was the govt who was responsible for bringing biased ,aprtial chamchaaaaaaaas to the CBi,hence the consequences!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: supre court
by Leroy Rajan on Jan 08, 2019 12:27 PM
To save the citizens of India from an autocratic and dictatorial government is also the duty of court.
the supreme court is interfering in every order of government this is not good. the general public pending decision in court should first give them which are hanging upon them for many years.
Re: supre court
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Jan 08, 2019 12:05 PM
it was the govt who was responsible for bringing biased ,aprtial chamchaaaaaaaas to the CBi,hence the consequences!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
