Why did Congress sat for 10 years for procuring Rafael ? Why ? Why ? Bofors, Augusta westland ?Hope you got the answer, i hope they did not find any middlemen like quattrochhi.
Re: Why did Congress sat for 10 years
by madhu on Sep 22, 2018 09:36 PM
OK... Congress is bad.... Can u answer why bjp still not answering whether modi proposed reliance name or not.. Why will french ex-president will tell lies... What will he get.... Ok atleast ravishankar prasad or our PM say hollande told lies and he is a lair... Can they say it.
Re: Re: Why did Congress sat for 10 years
by Suresh on Sep 22, 2018 10:00 PM
Very easy.. Why does french president says lies.. he is paid money... There is no other way to paint corrupt picture on Modi.
Did you even read the article. It clearly says the selection was done in 2012 with Mukesh, when the two brothers were still together. After they partitioned the Reliance Empire, the defence portfolio went to Anil. Anil created a separate entity Reliance Defecne, who was already chooses during the undivided Reliance Empire. Its so clear as Black and White. But these congress cats will close their eyes and claim it is dark.
Why did Congress sat for 10 years for procuring Rafael ? Why ? Why ? Bofors, Augusta westland ?Hope you got the answer, i hope they did not find any middlemen like quattrochhi.
Why did Congress sat for 10 years for procuring Rafael ? Why ? Why ? Bofors, Augusta westland ?Hope you got the answer, i hope they did not find any middlemen like quattrochhi.
Re: True
by Deepak on Sep 22, 2018 07:59 PM
Looks like the Bhakts are having a hard time trying a different explanation every new day, as this story progresses. Extreme creativity in action.
Re: Re: True
by nilanjan roy on Sep 22, 2018 08:06 PM
Terorist like you has only one agenda to destroy good governance.
As election comes close by Rahul will bring more allegation. Congess memeber Mr.Punawalla already told in the TV channel this is their agenda. But no takers. Only paisktan enjoying same as you.
It is quite absurd of Mr Prasad to allege some bribes during the UPA tenure. BRibes are paid when orders are placed, but UPA did not place any order , so the whole argument does not hold . Also, if the JV between dassault and Ambani was signed in Feb 2017, then where is the UPA period involved ?
Mr Prasad as a noted lawyer must at least base himself on half credible facts
Re: Not factual
by Deepak on Sep 22, 2018 07:48 PM
Prasad seems to be competing strongly with Jaitley for the title of 'court jester'. Seems like it is going to be a photofinish.
The BJP government cannot defend selection of Reliance at all. For any government post, there would be a written exam, interview etc etc. But for selection of such a important partner, what selection procedure was followed.
Re: Reliance, Dassault sealed the deal during UPA rule: BJP's cou
by VIJAY RAMAKRISHNAN on Sep 22, 2018 07:44 PM
The selection was made during UPA rule. Of what weight is Francois Hollande's assertion????.
The BJP government cannot defend selection of Reliance at all. For any government post, there would be a written exam, interview etc etc. But for selection of such a important partner, what selection procedure was followed.
