Corrupt congresss who looted country for 60 years is desperate finding an agenda of corruption against Modi Govt.. Absolutely careless against defence wings of the nation in their last 10 year tenure..comprising the national security by not acquiring the arms and ammunition.. The whole party is full of nuts,jokers and corrupts
Re: Congress desperate to find corruption in Modi Govt before 201
by Gladyschellam on Sep 22, 2018 01:18 PM
CORRUPTION: Centre's corruption does not affect directly common people whereas State's corruption directly harm people. Do you mean to say that all states in the country are not corrupt - Most states are being ruled since 1967 by various political parties - people are aware that who are all those who ruled their states.
Re: Re: Reliance defence was not even on paper just on air , get
by Bableesh Kumar on Sep 22, 2018 12:49 PM
It seems people like Avinash Kumar are already begging on the bus stops of Mumbai and waiting for Ambanis to give alums to them.
Dassault is an interested party having a vested interest in the deal. No one expects Dassault to say that choosing Reliance Defence was not their choice. If they say that it will amount to breach of terms of contract and the deal is over.
It's clear that Modi is lying. The ONLY reason politicians lie is to hide something and usually it's corruption or incompetence or both.
On Modi/Seetharaman`s suggestons, the bove clarification could have been given to save them. The truth will not come out unless and until the entire issue is placed before the hon`ble Supreme Court. With the entire army of Indian govt. ministers, spokespersons, media and the rest continuously telling lies and misleading details, it is not possible for anyone to know the truth. The PM has certainly taken a leap of confidence in completely disrupting the dead negotiations of the past and changed the deal in favour of Ambani believing the mediaborn confidence that the entire nation being in a stupor will swallow the deal without asking a question. But since national interests are involved, every single persons wants clarify, and frankness and truth from Modi and Seetharaman, not Oscar type performances on TV. People no longer would buy that.
Re: Modi proposed reliance.. This is not cleared
by daniel thorat on Sep 22, 2018 12:07 PM
They deliberately avoided saying that. But if things go ratonally, the deal stares into termination. Afterall, the the flying machines themselves will not be with our airforce tomorrow, and the big talk of "national security" joined in by senior airforce personnel is unrealistic because we have no war on hand. National security does not allow any leader to indulge in scams.
Re: Modi proposed reliance.. This is not cleared
by P S SHAH on Sep 22, 2018 12:11 PM
continue your debate with your assumptions and presumptions. You have enough time to do so.
Re: Re: Modi proposed reliance.. This is not cleared
by madhu on Sep 22, 2018 12:35 PM
I see u have more time to save bjp ... I don't have time... One suggestion dont support any party stand with truth... I support OROP and GST. If something is wrong I say it...
Re: Re: Re: Modi proposed reliance.. This is not cleared
by P S SHAH on Sep 22, 2018 12:43 PM
I support the party in which I have faith,trust and confidence. I dont follow any one or criticise any one by blindly following them like you.
Re: Re: Modi proposed reliance.. This is not cleared
by Sanjay Singh on Sep 22, 2018 12:38 PM
Were is the transparancy which was promised before becoming PM. Y this type of conflicting statment is coming from each and every one.
Re: Re: Re: Modi proposed reliance.. This is not cleared
by P S SHAH on Sep 22, 2018 12:45 PM
In the past, how many parties disclose the details of defence deals ? do you have any knowldege of country's security ?
No doubt, Modi must have threaned Dassault to clear his name, but fact is that a novice, that too unbecoming to be an Industrialist who caused a loss of not less than 1.00 lakh crore to Indian investors through his shady deals is picked up by Modi, itself is a shameful episode.Already all his companies are on the verge of closure and Bank dues amount to over 60000 thousand crores in a state of irrecoverability.
Re: French govt, Dassault clarify after Hollande drops Rafale bom
by Bingo on Sep 22, 2018 11:35 AM
Opposition can reach to pakistan ( Mani Ayyar) to topple the Indian Govt., then why not to Hollande.
Re: Re: French govt, Dassault clarify after Hollande drops Rafale
by daniel thorat on Sep 22, 2018 12:12 PM
"Toppling" Modi govt. is just not the aim of anybody. But,the clever machinations and shrewdly worked out schemes to build a giant size scheme in the deal cannot be looked at kindly even if that may topple the govt. No PM should in fact hope to remain in power after it is clearly seen that he has actively and personally led this matter himself, and there is no other person involved from India.
Re: Re: French govt, Dassault clarify after Hollande drops Rafale
by P S SHAH on Sep 22, 2018 12:13 PM
Bingo, Hollande has become the nost unpopular President france ever had in their history. He can do anything to come to limelight again
Re: French govt, Dassault clarify after Hollande drops Rafale bom
by Damodar Biswal on Sep 22, 2018 11:37 AM
Why do u blame Dassault? Why not the former president?Who told u to think that Modi has threatened the company?Anil Ambani is a failed businessman.Does that prohibit a foreign company from entering an agreement with it?
Re: Re: French govt, Dassault clarify after Hollande drops Rafale
by daniel thorat on Sep 22, 2018 12:15 PM
It seems to be necessary to see with open eyes that Ambani name was actively promoted by PM and that should not be missed out.
Do you think French company will spoil their name by giving Rafael Aircraft in the hands of Reliance without having enough confidence about quality? French are corrupt as Indians. Besides they have plenty of experience working with Govt. firms like HAL and Naval shipyards in the past. Defense technology is not a joke.
You all pseudo intellectuals, you really deserve congress and rahul gandhi. You donot deserve good and honest people. This is common sense that what dassault should be doing is their choice. Fighter jet is requirement of IAF, so they pushed for earliest acquistion. If you all pelple here think, that these all people conspired to help Anil Ambani.
Re: You all Pseudo intellectuals
by P S SHAH on Sep 22, 2018 11:38 AM
Mr Nilawar, to invite criticism for Rafale deal is a rap by BJP for opposition parties. Let them criticise the deal, have allegations against PM, say anything about present Defence minister etc. the BJP is going to win their election mainly on the basis of Rafale deal when the full information about this deal will be disclosed at the time of 2019 election and people like rahul gandhi will have o alternative but to hide his face.Modi is the cleanliest Prime minister and he will never involve himself or his government in any financial scam.
Re: Re: You all Pseudo intellectuals
by daniel thorat on Sep 22, 2018 12:18 PM
Hiding those million dollar details till 2019 is itself the soul of the scam. Rafale may not be helpful to Modi at all.
Re: You all Pseudo intellectuals
by daniel thorat on Sep 22, 2018 12:23 PM
Realization of time dimension is missing here. Where is the war? Why does Modi expect one now, and precisely when? Why hide behind the urgency? Air Chief Marshal and other seniour officers are only saying that it would be a good aircraft. They are not saying a word that the PRICE is right, that AMBANI inclusion is right, that PRICE DETAILS should be held back. That is big wash out and smokescreen.The entire procedural history of this deal till PM personally signed it without complying with so many requirements is a dead give away. If not, then let the nation know all truth from the PM himself.
If it was the decision of the French company to go with Anil Ambani, they should also clarify who else was in the reckoning. They should come clear on that aspect. They should also reveal what was the parameters that made AA become the only contender for the partnership.
Re: Eligibilty
by P S SHAH on Sep 22, 2018 11:33 AM
It is not mandatory on their part to sdisclose whatever decision they have taken for the deal. They have liberty to do whatever they want.
Re: Re: Eligibilty
by sunil anandapadmanabhan on Sep 22, 2018 01:36 PM
That means there is a Scam behind the silence of all involved. The brief must have been to get the deal at any cost.
