Discussion Board

What SC said on Section 377


Total 16 messages Pages | 1 | 2   Older >
MAYUR AGARE
If everybody is happy and hailing the judgement,then who had the
by MAYUR AGARE on Sep 06, 2018 05:41 PM

Since everybody is hailing the courtâs decision on the consensual homosexual sex,I wonder who opposed it..
Everybody is pointing their guns at rss and bjp..I donât think they had problem with sex,but with marriage..
India has always been land of hypocrites everyone does it but no one admits it..
Why does rss come into picture here?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Anil Sharma
What about ethics and values of the country ?
by Anil Sharma on Sep 06, 2018 05:30 PM

Where we are heading ? Everybody knows what is natural and right, still few people debate on this issue leaving apart Nation's other main stream unresolved issue which is directly concern with the safe and secure environment for the citizens.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Dr. M. M. Musthafa
article 377
by Dr. M. M. Musthafa on Sep 06, 2018 04:07 PM

gay and lesbian marriage cannot be considered right of equality. It is basically challenging the nature. Nature has set some harmony. Any deviation from this harmony is what we term as disease. Hence the judgment is quite unfortunate. Their approach may be on the basis of freedom of individual. I am still wondered why it is still not understood as physical or psychological disorder.
I hope government will note it seriously

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
sachchidanand dhar
SC on 377
by sachchidanand dhar on Sep 06, 2018 04:03 PM

1-Basically, The court has pointed out that Constitution is inconsistent with itself, and , in its interpretation. Same court and some other judges have interpreted it differently.
2-A resolute defendant can appeal against this judgement in the same court- and a different set of judges can reverse this verdict too.
3-How will the law be applied to those minorities who have separate personal laws?
4-"History owes apology to LGBTQ community"....Who is history? Does it mean the historians? Like Romilla Thapar and Irfan Habib ? Have they not hidden the fact that Babar was a homo? That during Turkish and Roman empires in middle ages ,castration of pre puberty boys was not uncommon?
5-Is it true that court wants people to change their mindset? Is it not true that Court's role is to interpret the constitution, and not change peoples' mindsets??????What will they do to those who don't change their mindsets?

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
sachchidanand dhar
SC on Sec 377
by sachchidanand dhar on Sep 06, 2018 04:01 PM

1-Basically, The court has pointed out that Constitution is inconsistent with itself, and , in its interpretation. Same court and some other judges have interpreted it differently.
2-A resolute defendant can appeal against this judgement in the same court- and a different set of judges can reverse this verdict too.
3-How will the law be applied to those minorities who have separate personal laws?
4-"History owes apology to LGBTQ community"....Who is history? Does it mean the historians? Like Romilla Thapar and Irfan Habib ? Have they not hidden the fact that Babar was a homo? That during Turkish and Roman empires in middle ages ,castration of pre puberty boys was not uncommon?
5-Is it true that court wants people to change their mindset? Is it not true that Court's role is to interpret the constitution, and not change peoples' mindsets??????What will they do to those who don't change their mindsets?

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
mohit kumar
Death of Manuvadis
by mohit kumar on Sep 06, 2018 03:13 PM  | Hide replies

RSS and modi gang hang your heads in shame

    Forward  |  Report abuse
s pillai
Re: Death of Manuvadis
by s pillai on Sep 06, 2018 03:31 PM
A few days ago everybody was saying Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra was an Modi stooge, now what happened?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sachchidanand dhar
Re: Death of Manuvadis
by sachchidanand dhar on Sep 06, 2018 04:05 PM
1-Basically, The court has pointed out that Constitution is inconsistent with itself, and , in its interpretation. Same court and some other judges have interpreted it differently.
2-A resolute defendant can appeal against this judgement in the same court- and a different set of judges can reverse this verdict too.
3-How will the law be applied to those minorities who have separate personal laws?
4-"History owes apology to LGBTQ community"....Who is history? Does it mean the historians? Like Romilla Thapar and Irfan Habib ? Have they not hidden the fact that Babar was a homo? That during Turkish and Roman empires in middle ages ,castration of pre puberty boys was not uncommon?
5-Is it true that court wants people to change their mindset? Is it not true that Court's role is to interpret the constitution, and not change peoples' mindsets??????What will they do to those who don't change their mindsets?

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
mohit kumar
Manuvadis
by mohit kumar on Sep 06, 2018 03:13 PM  | Hide replies

RSS and company hang your head and underwears in shame

    Forward  |  Report abuse
s pillai
Re: Manuvadis
by s pillai on Sep 06, 2018 03:32 PM
A few days ago everybody was saying Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra was a Modi stooge, now what happened?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
s pillai
Re: Manuvadis
by s pillai on Sep 06, 2018 03:32 PM
A few days ago everybody was saying Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra was a Modi stooge, now what happened?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SUSHILANGIRAS
section 377
by SUSHILANGIRAS on Sep 06, 2018 03:02 PM

but indian moral values goes down, whether we are moving towards west culture .

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 16 messages Pages: | 1 | 2   Older >
Write a message