Case end will be like this. Suitably supported by suitable supporter under suitable conditions, however suitable is not always suitable for various reasons but some sometimes suitable are suitable in various circumstances leading to suitable answers depending on various occasions with justifications as per our IPC and Constitution which is like a sieve with only holes.
I AM 200% SURE THAT JUSTICE MISHRA WON'T REACH DECISION ON ANY OF THESE CASES BECAUSE TIME IF RUNNING OUT FOR HIM, HE HAS GOT ONLY 24 DAYS LEFT TO RETIRE!!
Why they are depending on court verdict, if they can bring anti democratic law on SC/ST, why not bring law with joint session of parliament and Rajya Sabha and pass Ayodhya issue as well as Kashmir issue (to fight proxy war).
Re: BJP
by Sandeep Singh on Sep 05, 2018 02:16 PM
I can't believe that you do not know that there NO unanimity in Parliament on Ayodhya and Kashmir issues!!!!!
Re: BJP
by Sandeep Singh on Sep 05, 2018 02:16 PM
I can't believe that you do not know that there NO unanimity in Parliament on Ayodhya and Kashmir issues!!!!!
These cases do not include a nearly 10 year old appeal against an Allahabad High Court judgement, which decreed that Moslems in Uttar Pradesh are NOT A MINORITY.
Re: 5 High Profile-CJI
by P S SHAH on Sep 05, 2018 09:27 AM
As per the law, there is no restriction on Chief justice of Supreme court which matters he has to hear or not. As a sole deciding authority for distrubution of cases to the benches benches, he has every right to hear any matter which he want to clear before retirement during his tenure as CJI.
