Which rule, which provides total bias for SC,ST and backward. Which is one sided for women cases. Which is different to politicians and govt. servants comparing to common man. Which does not have opening for poor, needy and deprived. Shame on such laws after 70 years of independence.
Re: Constitution
by avadhut sudhakar joshi on Nov 03, 2018 12:44 PM
Aryngopal Agarwal! please refer speeches of your icon Modiji. According to Modiji whatever good is happened in India is due to constitution. There is exception to this law. It is about good things happened under Modiji regime in Gujarat. There whatever happened was due to Modiji.Now it must be same for the nation. Why are you blaming laws, rules and the constitution. RSS leaders told that reservation should continue for 1000 years.Why are not communicating your thoughts to Modiji? There is an open invitation by Modiji for new ideas.
"jurisprudence of a modern secular" can not be to honour a barbaric Invader who plundered this land ,made North India loose it's spoken language ,imposed their lineage language and left this land in 1947 as a country having the biggest population in the world of the religion to which he proselytized people here.GIVE A NAME COMPOSITE CULTURE .WE CONTINUE TO BE RULED BY BABUR -LAND INTERESTS .R.PONNAMBALAM
"a heritage monument,"for the victorious invader from the stanland UzbekinSTAN-Samarkund is here-,but invader legacy of defeat and ignominy for India .This Republic of India is not the Mughal HinduSTAN R,Ponnambalam
Those who drafted it had taken into account the experiences of the national movement as well as the experiences "They failed the very essence of the Indian unity and Indian Union.The premise of the accessioning of the princely states was equality in every respect,language included,and in every aspect and equal opportunity to every citizen of the each of the states accessioning to the Indian Union.The constitution Assembly in retrospect can be seen as Bench Fixed by replacing the then Governor General to bring a man who was speaking the Mughal court lineage and pakistan's national language and was befooling all saying that he was speaking HindiThe constituent Assembly arranged for HINDI MILLAT LIKE MD.IQBAL HAD SAID FOR SOME OTHER MILLATwhen” he had stated the dissolution of ethnic nationalities into a unified Muslim society (or millat) as the ultimate goal: "Butān-e raⁿŋg ō-xūⁿ kō tōṙ kar millat mēⁿ gum hō jā; Nah Tūrānī rahē bāqī, nah Īrānī, nah Afġānī (Destroy the idols of color and blood ties, and merge into the Muslim society; Let no Turanians remain, neither Iranians, nor Afghans).(sourceinternet) .”R.PONNAMBALAM
"A nomad happens"WHAT A DEVIANCE FROM FACT.BABAR A NOMAD!.ONE SHOULD READ NANAKVANI TO KNOW ABOUT THE BARBARIC ACT THIS INVADER DID .IT IS PROUDLY HAS BEEN SAID UMPTEEN NUMBER OF TIMES THAT MUSLIMS ENTERED INDIA AS VICTORIOUS INVADERS.HE WAS THE INVADER .IT IS THE INVADED PLACE.THE NATIVE SHOULD HAVE IT WHEN HAT INVASION WAS VACATED.R.PONNAMBALAM
It is different matter what is supresupreme but then why everyone has to touch thier religious book and confess before giving the statement. In India if the claim would have come from different community the matter would have been solved lightening fast.
