Just as women are not allowed in boys hostels. Boys are not admitted to girls school and vice versa.. Is that discrimination? How can the supreme court behave in such a juvenile manner is disappointing and disgusting.
Even in private clubs and gatherings certain practices and entries FOR CERTIAN PERSONS are restricted or not allowed ...specially privileged clubs and associations....WHERE IS RIGHT OF EQALITY THERE AND THEN?
Re: entry restrictions
by VASUDEDVAN on Oct 27, 2018 05:12 PM
when the country and its people are called more than literate by the world they do such illiterate and nastik act ,
Women in between this age have entered before also, even movie shooting has been done. Secondly, depicted as a bachelor, shy or gazing by women, or Brahmachari, the fact is Aypa, abandoned son of Shiv and Mohini (an incarnation of Vishn*) defeated ‘Mahishasuri’, and she turned into a women who proposed Aypa for marriage. Aypa promised to marry her the day new devotees would stop visiting him. But this did not happen. Agreed for marriage in condition cannot be ‘shy or gaze or brahmachari’. Thirdly, by supporting ban on triple T, some people are demanding equality and right of women but showing hypocrisy by supporting ban of entry of 10-50 women by not let them enter.
Re: Vision
by Voice of people on Oct 27, 2018 03:46 PM
Its all about 2019 election. First NRC card in N East, Then Sabarimala in Kerala, then Netaji card in W Bengal. They want to make up the shortfall of seats in MP, RJ,UP, Bihar, Gj in Kerala, N East and WB. More issues will come. Already Amit Sah has supported.
Re: Re: Vision
by Voice of people on Oct 27, 2018 03:48 PM
The fact is 1. In 1940, one Queen visited the temple 2. In 1986 a Tamil movie dance scene shooting took place inside the temple. 3. In 1990 commissioner’s family ritual took place inside with family women 4. In 1995 the then district collector (lady) visited the temple 5. In 1995 two VIP women have visited the temple
