Re: BRITISH RULE WAS THE GOLDEN ERA IN THE INDIAN HISTORY!
by RAMPRAPAN on Oct 02, 2018 01:03 PM
THE POINT TO BE NOTED IS THAT MOGHALS WERE CONQUERED BY THE CIVILIZATION OF PEOPLE WHOM THEY HAD CONQUERED, WHILE THE BRITISH WERE THE CONQUERORS SUPERIOR AND REMAINED UNAFFECTED/UNINFLUENCED BY THE LOCAL CIVILIZATION. THE BRITISH RULE HAS ENABLED REGENERATION OF INDIA , WHICH HAD NEVER KNOWN TO HAVE A HAD A GREAT HISTORY. THE BRITISH ESSENTIALLY FOLLOWED THE REVENUE SYSTEM AND SYSTEM OF GOVERNANCE INTRODUCED BY THE MOGHALS . THE GREAT MOGHAL SHER SHAH SURI AND HIS ILK HAD CREATED FOUNDATION OF GREAT INFRASTRUCTURE AND HAD NEVER TAMPERED WITH THE VILLAGE SYSTEM AND PUBLIC WORKS CULTURE THAT WAS PREVALENT . WOMEN'S EMANCIPATION AND WEAKENING OF SUPERSTITIONS STARTED ONLY AFTER THE ADVENT OF THE BRITISHERS
Re: BRITISH RULE WAS THE GOLDEN ERA IN THE INDIAN HISTORY!
by Somanathan Nair on Oct 02, 2018 01:28 PM
Pragmatic thinking should not be limited to One section only, that's the message of Mahatma. it applies to everyone. There's nothing called a golden era. British came in search of wealth to India just as french and Portugese did. This happened because since more than 5000 years Indians had established their trades all over the globe. India was a flourishing civilisation unlike the barbaric europian and arabic societies. British came to India in the disguise of establishing trade and once they settled and studied the shortcomings of rulers, they started colonising and ultimately conquered India. Its an established fact. The infrastructural development was merely for their needs. They never treated Indians with respect and equality and massacred people who raised voices, there are countless testimonials for this. How can such a period where basic human rights were denied and people were enslaved and deprieved of their possession and needs be termed as golden era. Get your definitions correct dont be blindfolded and ask others to be pragmatic.
Re: gandhi
by sachchidanand dhar on Oct 02, 2018 10:41 AM
It is time to take and chronicle an unbiased stock of effects of Mahatm'a ideologyon people of various provinces, whether it improved their sconditions or otherwise. Einstein had so much respect for Mahatma, because Mhatma had honestly and candidly admitted to Einstein that Ahimsa ideology would have failed in face of NATSI methods of Mass Annihilations. Incidently, I have not read Mahatma's opinions about Jewish and Gypsy mass exterminations.
