are not bothered about the SC verdict or whether young women not being allowed in the temple is really an ancient tradition or not !
It is the set of criminals dressed up as Ayappa devotees paid by the BJP that has been labouring to create unrest and chaos at the temple !
And they are repeatedly getting vexed that the Kerala police is not obliging them by resorting to firing on them at Sabarimala or any heavy handed measures !
They are also vexed greatly by the fact that CCTV cameras are installed everywhere and their attempts to provoke the police are getting captured and relayed and discussed on TV channels every day !
For instance, the BJP state general secretary, Surendran, arrived yesterday at Pampa with a group of 9 men with Irumudikettu on their heads. They began shouting slogans (in addition to the normal Nama Japams) in violation of section 144 that prohibits political acts in the area.
When the police took him into custody and brought him to the police station, he tried to drop his Irumudikettu to the ground twice ! On both occasions, the SP overseeing law and order at Pampa (who was standing next to him) caught the Irumudikettu before it reached the ground and placed it back on Mr Surendrans head !
The purpose of this act of Surendran was obvious - to claim that his Irumudikettu (considered sacred by devotees) - was knocked down by the police and trampled upon!
Surendran was too dumb to realise that all this was getting captured on the CCTV installed there!
Re: Most Sabarimala devotees
by MNN on Dec 03, 2018 01:08 PM
Koommali piris bias is clearly evident,as he has elaborated the actions in details. He like his other commie brethren are not all interested or bothered , about ancient practises, rituals or acharams, bcoz they consider it all superstitious. But these commie buffons fail to understand that many( in fact all ) Hindu rituals have a scientific leaning & explanation. Unfortunately over the years the scientific part of the rituals have been ignored, forgotten, or simply have not been passed on from generation to generations , which gives them a good chance to call it superstitious. The biggest culprits are all thos commies who claim to be Hindus, when it suits them, and at other times trample their religion for their narrow , petty gains. Shame on all such commies.
Re: Most Sabarimala devotees
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2018 09:31 AM
Is this kalumal, jobless, useless, commie komaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaali Buffoon has any other activity other than posting his repeated copy past all the time just because it is free of cost at Rediff ?
Alphons does not understand that peaceful atmosphere can be created only when all are obedient to the SC verdict. It is only when a groups of persons are bent upon not going by the law that restrictions have to be placed. As for facilities, the floods were so sever that all facilities cannot be expected this year. The same happened in Kedarnath in 2013 and it took around 2 years to recover. He is simply using this situation to lambast the CPM Govt.
In their hearts of heart BJP lead Central Government does not want Ram Mandir to be constructed at Ayodha otherwise, they would have brought ordinance,immediately.They would not give lame excuses for Supreme Court or Constitution for not issuing ordinance for Ram Mandir. In fact, BJP led Central Government does not want Ram Mandir to be constructed at Ayodha, they only want to exploit the emotion of Hindus for election purpose. If BJP led Central Government would respect Supreme Court's judgement, they would not certainly start agitation at Sabrimala.
Re: BJP does not want Ram Mandir
by MNN on Dec 03, 2018 01:13 PM
Morons like you Roy will always shout that the BJP govt has trampled judiciary, if they bring ordinance. Then there are parties like the great CON party of this country , who will shout the federal structure is in danger, constitution is in danger, will go to international places and speak ill about the country & the govt . Both ways the blame is on the govt. At least the govt is showing the patience to go with the highest courts verdict in spite of severe provocation,that itself speaks volumes about the Central govts intentions ,
SC has not interpreted the Constitution correctly. The Travancore Devaswom board deliberately did not reveal the correct rules that should be referred to in this case which mean SC will again make a wrong decision while reviewing. Will Central govt bring an ordinance at that time. Or at least will the Central Govt impose Art 356 and dismiss the state govt and allow polls to be conducted so that people can decide on a new govt which can then put forward a better argument in SC or facilitate to bring about an ordinance?
Re: But
by Gujjar on Nov 22, 2018 11:57 AM
A temple, or for that matter any place of Worship, is a place for peaceful worship and for offering prayers and other offerings .. So far as Sabarimala in Kerala is concerned, it has been converted into a place for political activities by some and that is the root cause of all the problems there ...
If any one, restricted as per beliefs or customs, attempts to enter such place of Worship, I guess the authorised people of Devasvom, etc., could easily handle it by educating them at the entry point itself, in Sabarimala case, it is Pampa, and make them understand that these are the customs being followed in the Temple and those who do not fall within that, should stay away as it may hurt the feelings of real devotees ...
What we see is something else and that's what is causing all the problems for the real devotees ...
Politics should be kept away from all such devotional places ... Real devotees should work for that ...
Re: But
by Sudarshan Nityananda on Nov 22, 2018 12:03 PM
you don't hold polls just because you want a better argument in the SC. A better argument may not exist and even if it does, TDB is free to place it in the SC. Why dismiss the Govt for this ?
Re: Re: But
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2018 09:42 AM
Who control Travancore Dewaswom Board in the state ? Why only Hindu temples are only targetted to bring under direct or indirect control off the state government ?
Re: But
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2018 09:40 AM
The Travancor Devaswom Board was one of the repondents in the petition filed by the petitioners. The state of kerala was also one of the respondent. Considering this sensitive issue, why none of the respondents accepted the verdict of Apex court and never thought of immediately filing review petition seeking stay for implementing the decision of Supreme court pending outcome of review petition ? In how many cases the state has sought review petitions in the past ? Why no immediate decision to file review petition in this Sabrimala case ?
Constitution should be supreme if not India is bound to whither!Be it Mandhir , Masjid or any other matter constitution of India supercedes everything!
Re: Its only the Constitution
by Gujjar on Nov 22, 2018 11:50 AM
A temple, or for that matter any place of Worship, is a place for peaceful worship and for offering prayers and other offerings .. So far as Sabarimala is concerned, it has been converted into a place of political activities by some and that is the root cause of all the problems there ...
if any one, prohibited as per beliefs, attempts to enter the area, I guess people could easily handle it by educating them at the entry point itself, in Sabarimala case, it is Pampa, and make them understand that this are the customs being followed in the Temple and those who do not fall within that, should stay away as it may hurt the feelings of real devotees ...
What we see is something else and that's what is causing all the problems for the real devotees ... Politics should be kept away from all such devotional places ... Real devotees should work for that ...
