Israel forces are authorized to $hoot at protestor$ even if came close to their posts. They have Aut0m@ted K!ll Robots in their border posts tied to Satellite and AI systems to neutralize thre@t$ at the borders and major entry points. They have a large wall separating the country from the ho$t!le land. Can we do all this in our country.. the secularists will say NO. Remember both are Democratic country, Both are Secular , and both have sizeable mus population percentage by volume. But in Israel, good sense prevail , unlike india. WE need iron hand.Time for carrot is over. It is not time for stick. I love the choice suggested by the author and he is right. Most i$$ue$ are restricted to the Kashmir Valley. Ladakh and Jammu are peaceful. Reward good behavior and pun!$h the bad. I am sure sane and peaceful people will move out of Kashmir to Ladakh and Jammu. The remaining will be the $cum, who are easy to deal with, in the l@nguage the under$tand.
With single majority in Parliament the BJP Party has failed to find a place in Kashmir valley for uprooted Hindu citizens. It is a proof that the BJP Party is not interested to solve the problems of the Hindus but it is interested in keeping the problem ticking.
Public is already confused because of this kind of garbage. by
auryas on Jun 25, 2018 11:48 AM | Hide replies | Hide message
As long as we have these phony arm chair analysts who come up with one idiotic suggestion each day ( depending on the previous night's cocktail), we keep having confusion in India.
The public domain is literally infested by bogus pundits and big mouths who talk , rant and rave incessant rubbish.
We fail to manage and moderate sh^t load of suggestions from all over the country from pundits ( both anointed by he media and self anointed).
Public is enough confused already - thanks to this kind of garbage.
Q. Was Ind economy 20% of World economy in 1700? A. Primitive economies of 1700 depended on populatn; then Ind had 20% & China 25% of world’s populatn, so their economies were 20% and 25%. All people in the world were poor--west, east, Chinese & Indians--with poverty evenly distributed. After 1700, west got industrialized and advanced fast. Q. Were 90% Indians literate in 1700 and had high per capita income? A. That is a flat lie. In fact 93% Indians were illiterate. Only Brahmin men, Vyshya men and some wealthy Kshatriya men were literate, and total literacy was below 7% in 1500 BC or 1800 AD. In 1740, Indians were much poorer than in 1940. Only with British rule literacy started rising. Q. Why 90% Indians think ancient Ind scriptures (of 4000 BC) have superior content vis-a-vis modern western sci & tech? A. Ind culture develops idiotic mind dominated by perpetual delusion. Indian scriptures are 10% facts and 90% figments of imagination. From lit angle, Ramayan, Mahabharat, etc are masterpieces. No doubt, HHinduism is highly secular & avg HHindus are not wicked like avg Mxlims. Q. Was there no caste-discrimination before in India? Was Mxslim ruler good? A. Caste system was at its ugly peak betwn 2000 BC & 1800 AD which started weakening after British entered. British liberated Indians by crushing Mxlim domination and ended their atrocities. MXLIM RULE THAT KILLED 600 MIL HINDUS (800-1800AD) WAS THE WORST
Re: BRITISH RULE WAS BETTER THAN MXLIM RULE
by Anup Halarnkar on Jun 25, 2018 02:56 PM
Lies. absolute lies. British came to india for the sole purpose of feeding their econonmy and not ours. Any idiot can understand this. If you are ignorant of our history atleast read the narratives by british historians on their purpose of colonization especially India!!!
Re: BRITISH RULE WAS BETTER THAN MXLIM RULE
by Anup Halarnkar on Jun 25, 2018 03:01 PM
Caste system came into play in Hindu kingdoms where Brahmins ruled the roost. They effectively divided the Hindu society so that their misdeeds may go scott free while all others would be punished in the name of God. Similar scenario also existed in Christianity where the Priests held upper hand and were involved in mass ekzecutions and inkwesitions of other religions.
And how come there is no noise even for independence in the PAK SIDE PORTION OF kASHMIR! This is because these Indian SOBs are not date enough to screw the trouble shooters in the last 70 years. With lakhs of soldiers, india unable to enforce control, while with hundreds of soldiers, Israel enforces deadly discipline in around a small dot i.e. Israel.
Well said Sir. But I'm surprised to see these kind of articles in Rediff... These are not so pro India news agencies. Anyways.. All said is correct but 1 Major factor beyond Militancy or Pakistan ( Both are synonyms) is China. China has a hand in Kashmir valley as it has the CPEC.
The J&K issue could not and cannot be solved peacefully, with any "dialogue", "negotiations" etc. etc. The fact is that it is a State with Muslium majority who have their own religion and culture and ethos which all they love and are prepared to protect at all costs. Unfortunately, the PDP-BJP alliance brought Ram Madhav, a person more committed to RSS thinking than any other thing, as a key person and that created suspicions all around. Kathua etc. are really merely incidental happenings. It would be best if the State is divided fast. The other State that must be divided into 3 parts is the UP. The present CM seems to be in a hurry to carry out the RSS agenda faster than anyone else. The sooner UP is divided and the CM sent to act Gorakhpur mahant, the better for our nation. This is my opinion based on the basis of happenings and the communal ferocity being initiated and supported by the CM.
Re: Dividing J&K - wise thought indeed
by Krishnan on Jun 25, 2018 12:04 PM
Your bar supplier did not do anything. Nehru spoiled and Indhira Gandhi had a chance when 90000 Pakistan soldiers surrendered in 1971. Rajiv was busy making Farooq Absullah and his brother in law fight.
Re: Re: Dividing J&K - wise thought indeed
by Krishnan on Jun 25, 2018 12:06 PM
His brother in law's name is Shah. Militants raised their head only a in late 80s
Re: Re: Dividing J&K - wise thought i
by Krishnan on Jun 25, 2018 12:06 PM
His brother in law's name is Shah. Militants raised their head only a in late 80s
