If Pakistan could invade Kashmir and take POK then why did not we throw them out for good from Kashmir ! It was a useless agreement which did not serve India's interests and left the Kashmir pot boiling. We even returned their 80,000 POWs. What India won militarily we lost it through immature diplomacy. India should have walked in Kashmir and taken over POK.
If Pakistan could invade Kashmir and take POK then why did not we throw them out for good from Kashmir ! It was a useless agreement which did not serve India's interests and left the Kashmir pot boiling. We even returned their 80,000 POWs. What India won militarily we lost it through immature diplomacy. India should have walked in Kashmir and taken over POK.
Re: Could India have solved the Kashmir problem in Simla?
by deepak vora on Aug 13, 2018 03:26 PM
it can still be fought over and the gandhis should have done this earlier, but still not late
If India Had initiated Genocide proceedings against 97000 captured Pak spldiers for what they committed in Bangladesh Pak would have come kneeling to vacate POK in exchange of the soldiers. Great opputunity lost! FOOLS!
Who was holding the bow and where went the arrow! Who was in the helm of the country, how wise was the leader and who influenced the leader! How sincere and matured was their foreign policy. If they harmed the country, made it 'Apang' (handicapped), 'rudali' would not be the solution. Deshkeeizzatkhatremeinhaijanaab, do something, o present government, and its Captain.
